Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results

I remember the Y2K Bush vs Gore controversy this is going to be worse if there is legs to this story.... Its not going to be good for the country....
I don't like Clinton so if she becomes Prez it is a small win for me only because I can't stand the colossal asshole. But nothing should be more disturbing than hacking a democratic election. I would say that this would rock the foundations of this country to the core-bone.
 
I seem to recall Nitro and other Liberals here labeling us Republicans as kooks for suspecting what they suspect now - voter fraud.

One key reason why Liberals lost - they lost the moral high ground. They became hypocrites. Invented a new situational morality and then excused themselves of it, when it benefited then. They rationalize it by asserting THEY are intellectually superior. The majority apparently consider it delusional behavior. The majority also saw through their hypocritical self-righteous clap-trap and had enough.
 
  1. WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWOOOW
    wow
    wow
    wow

    Count them again!
    Count them again!
    Count them again!
    Count them again!

    :wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf:

    Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results

    By Dan Merica, CNN

    Updated 10:23 PM ET, Tue November 22, 2016


    161109095636-36-hour-clinton-campaign-rollercoaster-origwx-00012214-exlarge-169.jpg


    (CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, according to a source with knowledge of the request.

    The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides on a call last Thursday.

    The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source...

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/index.html

It is interesting that real computer scientists don't consider any of these people to be computer scientists. They all are academics. Not a single one of them has written a line of code in their lives that was used in a commercial application. Most would flunk any type of phone screen for a computer science or IT position.
 
This will go absolutely nowhere.

What it does do is make the left look even more hypocritical when they went after Trump for not accepting election results, or calling things rigged, or saying there would be fraud, etc.

Totally hilarious.
 
Back
Top