Off hand, I can think of no better example than yours of the kind of reasoning that makes the empowerment of demagogues possible . [I added underlining to your quoted post above, as it seemed appropriate.]
Off hand, I can think of no better example than yours of the kind of reasoning that makes the empowerment of demagogues possible . [I added underlining to your quoted post above, as it seemed appropriate.]This is exactly the kind of moronic, over the top rhetoric that makes impossible the sort of nuanced debate Pie claims to like.
If you call my president Hitler, my response is not to point out the obvious differences. It is to say fuck off. You are not making a respectable argument so why should I waste my time?
Off hand, I can think of no better example than yours of the kind of reasoning that makes the empowerment of demagogues possible . [I added underlining to your quoted post above, as it seemed appropriate.]
Off hand, I can think of no better example than yours of the kind of reasoning that makes the empowerment of demagogues possible . [I added underlining to your quoted post above, as it seemed appropriate.]
No of course not. Calling the newly elected president Hitler would not, in my opinion, be "reasoned debate." I don't know anyone personally that has referred to Trump as Hitler but I understand that some have. I pointed out that there are a few obvious similarities between the two men. These are characteristics of the two men that would be immediately evident to anyone.But calling the duly elected president hitler is reasoned debate?