not to argue with
-BARRONS- or -BLOOMBERG-
but ... this HEADLINE # of 50 % was only mentioned in passing in the last paragraph of that article in BARRONS
( excerpted from BARRONS )
-commodites in general were fully valued ( fundamentally ) in 9/2007-
-Based on the 24-commodityS+P GS index that would mean 30 % collapse from present levels
-commodity values could be cut in 1/2 before they stabilize-
oh well ... J. Rogers says we are "only in the 4th innig of a 9 inning game"
basically they are looking for a "slowdown from China" somehow
to do this
www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601012&sid=ae1ntMGQ1awk&refer=commodities
-BARRONS- or -BLOOMBERG-
but ... this HEADLINE # of 50 % was only mentioned in passing in the last paragraph of that article in BARRONS
( excerpted from BARRONS )
-commodites in general were fully valued ( fundamentally ) in 9/2007-
-Based on the 24-commodityS+P GS index that would mean 30 % collapse from present levels
-commodity values could be cut in 1/2 before they stabilize-
oh well ... J. Rogers says we are "only in the 4th innig of a 9 inning game"
basically they are looking for a "slowdown from China" somehow
to do this
www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601012&sid=ae1ntMGQ1awk&refer=commodities