<b>Inandlong's taking it personally is his problem. Also, you are not obligated to call someone "your" president if he in fact was never validly elected to the office.</b>
what? Perhaps a quick review of American history and government is needed. Seems to me, we've always had a "validly" elected president.
Since you're buying into the "Liberal" thought process, ask your party why they chose to toss out over 1 million absent ballots in the state of California? Since the vast majority were going to our current President, could it be it would have thrown the "we got more votes" argument out of the window?
I'm so sick and tired of the whiners about the last presidential election. Maybe if they chose to OFFER something new, instead of simply preaching "gloom and doom", they might have not gotten trounced in 2002.
what? Perhaps a quick review of American history and government is needed. Seems to me, we've always had a "validly" elected president.
Since you're buying into the "Liberal" thought process, ask your party why they chose to toss out over 1 million absent ballots in the state of California? Since the vast majority were going to our current President, could it be it would have thrown the "we got more votes" argument out of the window?
I'm so sick and tired of the whiners about the last presidential election. Maybe if they chose to OFFER something new, instead of simply preaching "gloom and doom", they might have not gotten trounced in 2002.
you arent funny