Quote from 377OHMS:
With the reelection of Obama I've decided that I won't pay additional taxes and fees above what I'm already paying.
Part of my plan to offset the new taxes is to "take" money from the system via grants and other government programs and to eliminate charitable contributions. Nothing there that is silly or in conflict with conservative values.[/QUOTE]
If nothing there is in conflict with conservative values, it seems rather pointless that you would express your worry that these same views may put you "in dutch" with your conservative friends.
Have a look...
Quote from 377OHMS:
We're going to become professional "takers" and it looks as though we will live in Oregon, the only place more liberal than where I already live.
I hope that doesn't put me in dutch with my conservative friends but everyone here seems to recognize that the war is over and it is time to work the system.
I don't even know what posts you are talking about. I didn't notice that PT was offended anywhere in this thread.[/QUOTE]
Come now, let's keep the false naivety in la-la land where it belongs.
Believing that people are banding together against you is a sign of paranoia. [/QUOTE]
It is interesting that right after I point out your obvious paranoia, you now feel a need to make up a reason for mine.
For you to investigate someone's use of language, then falsely assume I am another individual, because I used the word "adorable", is undoubtedly a sign of paranoid activity.
On the other hand, people banding together against others is quite common. In fact, it happens every minute of every day, throughout the world.
What is perhaps the most interesting aspect, is that you are either choosing to ignore the fact that you just jumped on a "band" wagon with your false assertions of my identity, or you are simply not aware that you have done so.
First PT made the original assertion, then it was followed up by Lucrum, then pspr, and then immediately followed by you.
This would be a classic case in social study , in which I may forward to a friend of mine who professes at the University of Maryland. If she wishes to use it for teaching purposes, Would you and your friends be willing to participate in the lesson?
I think you know that I'm intelligent so I'm not sure why you would even assert that I'm "lacking upstairs".[/QUOTE]
You are overly confident in what my knowledge of your intelligence may be.
Are you going to tell me and others that you are not lacking anything upstairs?
Lucrum is a jet pilot, Pspr an engineer, PT is formidably intelligent, Tsing Tao is frightening, nutmeg is obviously smart and logical. You simply damage your own reputation when you say things like that.[/QUOTE]
For you to deny that you are part of a group of individuals who bands together against others, you sure seem to have a clear idea of the individuals that you assume I am referring to. I made no mention of any of those names.
As for Lurcum being a jet pilot- my buddy Dale is a jet pilot too, and how they ever let his dumb ass fly a jet is subject to investigation. He'll be the first to tell you that.
Engineers- lol! I've sued the pants off of more than one of those idiots.
Mods don't read P&R threads, I mean *ever*, trust me on that.[/QUOTE]
Well, I certainly wouldn't want to doubt your vast and certain knowledge of such matters, since you are apparently lacking nothing upstairs, but perhaps you missed the conversation GreggT and I had on this very thread.
Have a look...
Quote from TGregg:
Wanna know why they are still tribes, living in huts, suffering from disease and all the other ills...
Feel free to check his status
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/member.php?s=&action=getinfo&userid=9310
It isn't complicated. You attack convervative members and then minutes later post a disingenuous apology and state that you don't have any hatred towards conservatives. A few posts later you are doing it again.[/QUOTE]
You making weightless accusations obviously works within your band of thugs, who have all shown the tendency to agree with statements at face value without any attempt at proper research, but others can easily see yours and their blunders.
Your posts have a very distinctive pattern to them that resembles cgroupman including a false belief that you are neutral, a tendency towards effeminate words like "adorable" and a habit of making faux apologies.[/QUOTE]
If I claimed to be neutral on any matters, you cannot prove otherwise.
The only apology I have made was for the use of my language to a woman(whose sex was unbeknownst to me at the time)- the same woman that you went on to denigrate alongside your group of pathetic thugs.
You are a punk, by any decent person's standards. You may try to argue, but until you stop behaving like a spoiled boy and admit to being one, you have no hope for ever becoming a man.
I haven't made any apology that wasn't sincere, and you are simply attempting to attack my integrity by saying otherwise.
You are also apparently too thick to comprehend the statement I made to PT, as I never apologized to him or said that I meant "no harm", as you have falsely claimed...
Quote from 377OHMS:
You fire on conservatives and then in the next breath you claim you have no beef with us and "mean no harm".
I simply requested that he let me know that HE meant no harm. Read for yourself, and this time maybe try using what you are not lacking upstairs
Quote from Hoofhearted:
PT,
If you pass insults because it is just in good fun, I am ok with it. But you need to let me know that you mean no harm.
Those guys you mention aren't my "goons" and I've had fights and disagreements with every one of them except nutmeg. If they don't like what I'm saying they call me out right on the spot. I've had knock-drown drag-outs with Tsing Tao. I've had big fights with Max E. Pad and others. Generally though I get along with them because I share their conservative values.[/QUOTE]
Again, I never mentioned any names, but you obviously have a clear idea of who your goons may be.
So, you're in Vegas, right? [/QUOTE]
Wrong again punk
p.s.
Lucrum the jet pilot- LOL!
