Comey handed Mueller a fat case file on Trump

ExGOPER talking to itself...

upload_2017-6-11_11-38-28.png
 
Poor little snowflakes, tugger carlsoning each other in the hope that they would troll me out of the forum.

Keep trying.
 
java said:
Do you think Trump will be indicted for obstruction of justice?
More...
Trump won't be indicted for anything as long as he is the President. The remedy for a crime committed by the President is to both impeach and convict him of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors defined however the Congress shall. Once he has been removed from office, or his term expires, he could be indicted the same as any other citizen, including for alleged crimes he has committed while in office. Impeachment and trial in the Senate is a political exercise to determine whether a sitting President shall be removed from office thus subjecting him to the same statutory laws you and I are subject to.

It is not illegal to lie except when under oath. Virtually all Presidents have lied. And we are not talking about simple misunderstandings or one's accidentally getting their facts wrong or being misinformed. We are talking about actual lies when the truth is known to the teller of the lie. Lies which impugn the integrity of others, lies which put our nation at risk, lies which cost the lives of others, lies of the worst kind.

You can lie with impunity except when you legally attest that you are telling the truth. Congress has the power to remove a President from office for any reason they choose, including a pattern of regular and more or less continual lying. But rest assured, they will not do that. Pity.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...y-presidents-liars-dishonest-fabulists-214024
 
Last edited:
This investigation will segue very nicely into Trump getting a long-awaited and much needed financial colonoscopy. That Trump brought it on himself with his proprietary combination of ignorance and hubris is the cherry on top.
 
exGOPer said:
James Comey refused to say on Thursday if he believed President Donald Trump obstructed justice. But the ousted FBI director gave Robert Mueller plenty to work with as the special counsel investigates whether the president or his allies committed any crimes.

During two riveting hours before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey testified Trump requested his "loyalty," urged him to end a probe into then-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and then, while stewing over what the Russia investigation was doing to his administration, the president fired him.


Comey declined to render his own legal opinion as to whether what Trump did was illegal, but he did explain that this critical question — along with the notes he took from his conversations with the president — now resides with Mueller.

“I don't think it's for me to say whether the conversation I had with the president was an effort to obstruct,” Comey said. “I took it as a very disturbing thing, very concerning, but that's a conclusion I'm sure the special counsel will work towards to try and understand what the intention was there, and whether that's an offense.”

Mueller himself may not have been surprised by Comey’s much-anticipated Senate testimony since he’d already been briefed on what would be said. But with Comey’s story now widely aired publicly, it did give lawmakers, as well as veteran prosecutors and defense attorneys, a chance to reflect on what Mueller is now working with as he gets started on a probe that essentially has an unlimited budget and all the time he needs to go in whatever directions he needs to.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/08/james-comey-robert-mueller-trump-case-file-239319
More...


The first line of the article debunks the whole point of the article. I didn't have to have to read the rest.
 
Frederick Foresight said:
This investigation will segue very nicely into Trump getting a long-awaited and much needed financial colonoscopy. That Trump brought it on himself with his proprietary combination of ignorance and hubris is the cherry on top.
More...

Its not an 'investigation'. It is a 'matter'.
 
wildchild said:
Its not an 'investigation'. It is a 'matter'.
More...
There are two types of investigations. The ones that start with enough evidence to start an investigation, and the other ones, where investigations are started to look for evidence. The second type are referred to as witch-hunts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top