Quote from shorty_mcshort:
Dave,
Do you like locking in a piece once the initial risk is covered? Why is that? I have read in Van Tharps book (How to have Financial Freedom through trading) and he says that traders that do this have a strong desire to be right on a trade. I have done some testing on a pullback strategy and it seems that it really does smooth out the drawdowns but you have to be right alot to make money with this exit strategy.
E
I do. Yes, I recently had a lenghtly discussion with a fellow trader discussing the psychological side of money management vs. the conceptual.
I belive you have to find something that works both psychologically and conceptually. In other words, something that is conceptually correct that also fits your psyche.
From a psychological standpoint, I like getting the stop to breakeven and taking partial profits when the initial risk is covered. This way, barring overnight gaps, your costs are covered and you have a chance at a "free ride" on the remainder---i.e. a potential for a homerun. psychologically, this is a great place to be.
Yes, this is only a 1 to 1 relationship (on the first loaf). And, on the surface, has the potential to have a negative expectency. However, the real pay off is in the 2x, 3x or ??X (in theory unlimited) profits on the remaining shares (my goal on each swing trade is to turn it into a longer-term trend trade). You can also "beat" the system by taking profits shy of the 1 for 1 in poor market conditions (e.g. when things are reversing)---on the flip side, when things are really moving, you can let the first loaf ride for more than 1x.
If desired, email me and I can I can parse out slides that I have from a presentation/video that covers the discretion involved to help improve performance of this basic money management.
I can also check tradingmarkets archives and convert anything relevant to PDF for you.
Let me know.
Dave