College Students in Favor of Wealth Distribution...

Quote from Lucrum:

Who asked your opinion?

Man, no kidding. I put that self-important prick On Ignore after his second post in P&R. Where do these jackasses come from?
 
Quote from Ricter:

It was you who said that big fish eating small fish was the way of the world, and you also agreed that it was therefore ok for little fish to school and eat big fish.
Yeah, so?

Or is this today's "Ricter riddle"?
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

Man, no kidding. I put that self-important prick On Ignore after his second post in P&R. Where do these jackasses come from?
I'm thinking most of these registered this month alias's are guys who've been banned previously.
 
College kids favor wealth distribution because most of them have no wealth in college and most won't even get a job after they graduate from college if they even make it through college without flunking out first.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

You don't have to be able to vote to get land. You just have to WORK AND FUCKING EARN IT Ricky.

In fact at times the federal government gave land away.

That's right a granddad of a past friend of mine got thousands of acres on land grants umteen years ago, now my ol buddy is a large farm land owner. He's not a worker, all of his land is leased and in government programs. Hope they tax his ass for the profits on the land when he sells it, he's sucked enough money from the government to make up for 100 welfare families. People like him make a good argument for taxing inheritance.
 
Quote from Ricter:

So the landless could not vote to get some land, how convenient for... not them.

Wow, so people should use the government to take some land from somebody and give it to them!! With a focus like that you will lose all your freedoms eventually!
 
Quote from FortuneTeller:

College kids favor wealth distribution because most of them have no wealth in college and most won't even get a job after they graduate from college if they even make it through college without flunking out first.

Wealth distribution appeals to those who have not earned wealth, of course. It's not only immoral, it's anti-America.

The "promise of America" used to be "the opportunity to become wealthy if you were able... and freedom from having a government on your back." That's what the promise of America should still be.

:mad:
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

Wealth distribution appeals to those who have not earned wealth, of course. It's not only immoral, it's anti-America.

The "promise of America" used to be "the opportunity to become wealthy if you were able... and freedom from having a government on your back." That's what the promise of America should still be.

It's ok for those without wealth to gang up and take it from those with wealth. It's the way of nature. Lucrum said it, so it must be true.
 
Back
Top