Quote from Mike805:
You are making some general and biased statements here. I will be the first to say that your are presenting an opinioned viewpoint that holds little fact; other than an account of possibly your own experiences. Words like "almost universally" should be a warning flag to anyone here.
.....
Contrary to what certain people here believe, engineering is a financially rewarding discipline, but, like anything worthwhile, it takes time and effort.
I think its a red flag when people paint an unrealistic picture of a profession.
No, these aren't my experiences. I own two technical firms and have numerous patents and awards. However I see the writing on the wall: most of my colleagues have moved their operations overseas or are planning to do so. These are not unknown little operations but some of the biggest players in tech in the US.
That said, I stick with my analysis. I am in constant contact with people at the top of the engineering and technical business in the US. The priorities are not to treat their engineers and scientists well - except at a few exceptional firms like my own where I control things and we have a unique market niche.
Some people think that 100K ballpark job is good compensation for 7-10 years of prep work on your own dime and time. I do not.
Moreover the trend is to move as much as possible offshore.
Ask most engineers if they think its a long term viable career and they will answer no, as evidenced by the well published numbers of the average lifetime of an engineer in the profession and the average lifetime earnings.
So, if you truly love engineering and science then do it but understand that you probably wont have a good stable career in the future if that is your only recourse for making money.
Dont listen to people that paint simplistic overly optimistic views of the profession for their own ends ...