Quote from athlonmank8:
No, he's not Wrb's correct.
------------------------------------
OT: Honestly JH, how do you trade with all that gobbly gook on your mind?
----------------------------------
Instead of playing around with patterns, why not stick to 1 and explain your risk, reward on it. Where's your entry? Where's your stop? Where's your exit? How do I trail? THEN move onto the next one.
You guys need to be more specific than posting something that looks "neat" and just leaves it at that.
Nice comment.
I do what you suggest. First and foremost I stick with one pattern and it has served me well since 1957. the parallelogram always works for defining the markets offer. I like the combination of three moves in a pattern that have four coresponding volume movesl leading price.
I like that parallelograms overlap and just how they overlap.
this makes me a proponent of following a fixed order of events and as a consequence always "knowing that I know".
My risk is small and I take what the market offers.
For me, I am always in the market and always on the correct side. I use the parallelogram to make this possible.
I do not use stops for two reasons: first, I know that I know and second, when a person trades at a multiple of the market capacity it is not possible to use stops as a trading strategy. The strategy that replaces stops is a partial fills strategy.
In trading, the entry/exit approach does not apply to expert trading whereby the market's offer is being taken. The more compelling strateg is one where hold/ reversal is used. Profit in either case is made in profit segments. the limiting case for taking profit segments is linked reversal trades. Some people do not cotton to the fact that the market is always trending; I happen to and I find that there is always a correct side to be on to make money.
For me a reversal is a two part thing. It is an exit as well as an entry in the opposite direction. For me, volume leads price and a trade price. I trade as if there is a zig zag chart being displayed for me.
To assure that volume is understood as an event based type of observation, I use Pro Rata Volume as a shadow on each volume bar. this menas that immdeiately upon open of each bar I know the volume that the bar will ened with. Id either a peak or trough is indicated, the price will make a turn sometime in that bar formation. Thus I carve the turn.
To specifically do the carving I watch other leading indicators of the turn (10 to 12 to b exact).
Each would be goobly gook to you. That is your persuation
To lend specificity to my comments, some of them are as follows all in order of their leading of price appearance:
1. Stretch /squeeze. I invented this to frontrun the "smart money". The formula includes the Premium as announced daily before open. It run 20 t0 30 seconds ahead of the market and compares cash with index and is normalized to be stochastic by the Premium.
2. The DOM "walls". Walls are limit orders placed in excess of market capacity based on contemporary time rate of change. The market moves to and bounces off these excessive sizes. three games are played around and about these values. I track the games as a simple exercise.
3. The OTR parallelogram.
4. and 5. Two pair analysis of two OTS's where one lead the traded insturment.
6. Three nested fractals of events on the traded instument. I trade the middle fractal so pattern completion on the faster fractal is a three movementleading indicator which I "count down".
7. PRV.
8 through 12. First and second derivatives (statistically calculated) of parts of the displays above or color "thermometers" which indicate tendencies and their extents.
How I trade with all my knowlege and skills acquired over 53 years. is sort of like you drive a race car or ski Olympic ski courses or compete in America's Cup races. It is probably something you cannot imagine.
I log 10 to 12 8 1/2 by 11 sheets in a trading session over RTH's. Most of my life since emial was invented I shared my logs electronically.
the SEC has cited me for insider trading of multiple account POA trading over a several year period when they first learned to do eletronic monitoring of large accounts. Fortunately, they wre able to conclude they fucked up with each citation. It was a learning period for the SEC about just how much of the market's offer could be taken and how timing markets to frontrun them is a practice of some experienced and skilled traders.
My past post you referenced was a beginner level contribution to this thread. This one is a more davanced post to help better orient you to the reality of expert trading.
Good luck to you in learning more about skilled trading.