Let's ignore the discussion of whether adding a backspread is good protection and just focus on the equivalence. Do you realize that a covered call is the same as a naked put?
Ignoring dividends and carry cost:
+ stock - call = - put
For ease of discussion, consider one August backspread. You want to add one -Aug20p/+Aug 15 put spread and take the credit and buy say 2 more Aug 15 puts. Instead of doing that, sell one Aug 20 call against your stock and use the call premium to buy the Aug 15 puts.
If the call premium pays for 3 puts, you end up with:
+100 XYZ
- 1 Aug 20 call
+3 Aug 15 put
So instead of adding a backspread to your long stock and doubling your downside riisk (tripling it in your original suggestion), just convert the stock into one backspread. The above would be the same position as:
- 1 Aug 20 put
+3 Aug 15 put
Clear as mud?
Ignoring dividends and carry cost:
+ stock - call = - put
For ease of discussion, consider one August backspread. You want to add one -Aug20p/+Aug 15 put spread and take the credit and buy say 2 more Aug 15 puts. Instead of doing that, sell one Aug 20 call against your stock and use the call premium to buy the Aug 15 puts.
If the call premium pays for 3 puts, you end up with:
+100 XYZ
- 1 Aug 20 call
+3 Aug 15 put
So instead of adding a backspread to your long stock and doubling your downside riisk (tripling it in your original suggestion), just convert the stock into one backspread. The above would be the same position as:
- 1 Aug 20 put
+3 Aug 15 put
Clear as mud?