Codifying SCT

OK, then strike my previous comment for not being in the spirit of the thread... I'll repent by reading all Jack's old posts after which my mind will be so twisted that I'll believe :)
Quote from Joe Doaks:

I meant 666. I would never put Tums on ignore. I love the whole SCT crew. They lighten up an otherwise dull day trading.
More...
 
For what? Posting my opinion of Jack? Serious question. Tell me what I posted that would warrant my account being deleted.

You're the one who needs to go, censoring posts with a bias when you're supposed to be a neutral mod.
 
Good point, 666! You should be able to say anything shitty over HERE that you want to. Tums, I urge you just to read and enjoy this thread but don't moderate it except for obscenity (well, really BAD obscenity). If you let the pond stagnate all the anti-Jacks will slither over here and leave the rest of ET alone. Sort of a reform school for the B-team.
 
Quote from Joe Doaks:
Good point, 666! You should be able to say anything shitty over HERE that you want to. Tums, I urge you just to read and enjoy this thread but don't moderate it except for obscenity (well, really BAD obscenity). If you let the pond stagnate all the anti-Jacks will slither over here and leave the rest of ET alone. Sort of a reform school for the B-team.
More...

unless i received a complaint, you can be rest assured, nothing will be touched.
 
Hmmm. I suggest a moderating rule that you only delete posts for a complaint if the complainant is a POSTER on that thread. Otherwise the complainant can go elsewhere and screw himself. Especailly THIS thread. Who the hell posting here is going to be offended by ANYTHING posted here, haha!
 
Well, codifried SCT dint do tew bad terday. 29.16 net NQ points, 65% of the range. Not bad a-tall fer grossly overoptimized code. I have to hack it a lot during the day to get it that good, but hey, that's how SCT works! Don't like the results? Change the rules!
 

Attachments

How about if we stick to IMpersonal attacks? You know, nuthin' persnal? Thank goodness you aren't offended by vaudeville, broad satire, slapstick and sarcasm.
 
For all three of you who stared in amazement at my latest results with chicken-fried SCT, I neglected to mention this version incorporates 14 distinctly different combinations of the most important states of velocitance, peakage, and volumicity as discussed earlier. Of course, with 24 such possible combinations, I am far from done. But the preliminary result is quite gratifying. Thank you all for following along as a dying old man constructs his magnum opus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top