So there used to be this saying before the internet made everyone a constitutional scholar, “tell it to the judge.”
His attorney argued that having negative thoughts isn’t a crime and the judge looked at the systematic stock piling of weapons, the research into mass murdering, The compiling of a hit list and where to find them, the fully formulated reasoning for mass murder and said no bail, go to jail.
Having an argument over whether this guy is a threat to the public isn’t even academic at this point. Next stop is either a trial or a plea.
His attorney argued that having negative thoughts isn’t a crime and the judge looked at the systematic stock piling of weapons, the research into mass murdering, The compiling of a hit list and where to find them, the fully formulated reasoning for mass murder and said no bail, go to jail.
Having an argument over whether this guy is a threat to the public isn’t even academic at this point. Next stop is either a trial or a plea.