CNN say Mueller can charge president but didn't

[TreeFrogTrader]

McGahn, “Hell no, I didn’t do what that moron wanted.”

View attachment 201219

"Mueller Report"

Bob Mueller - the same guy who said in his report that he was not able to find sufficient evidence to prosecute Trump.

Not to worry, Foreskin Freddy and SpikeTarder have informed us that he will change his mind at the Congressional hearing.

Good luck wit dat.

LOSERS!!!

 

[Frederick Foresight]

"Mueller Report"

Bob Mueller - the same guy who said in his report that he was not able to find sufficient evidence to prosecute Trump.

Not to worry, Foreskin Freddy and SpikeTarder have informed us that he will change his mind at the Congressional hearing.

Good luck wit dat.

LOSERS!!!

I'm guessing that the loudest member of a book club is the one who only leafed through the reading material in the last minute.

Overcompensation much?

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

I'm guessing that the loudest member of a book club is the one who didn't read the book.

Overcompensation much?

So, if you read the book, show us where it says that Mueller is saying that he found sufficient evidence to prosecute Mueller on any charge and is proceeding to do that.

Note: Mueller providing reading material for Congress and the lefty press to consider impeachment does not constitute a criminal indictment under American law.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

So, if you read the book, show us where it says that Mueller is saying that he found sufficient evidence to prosecute Mueller on any charge and is proceeding to do that.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.79e8cc98c701

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.6dbfa1da4974

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/mueller-report-impeachment-referral/587509/

Take your time...

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.79e8cc98c701

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.6dbfa1da4974

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/mueller-report-impeachment-referral/587509/

Take your time...

Not going to read all that but you are saying that Mueller has been indicted Trump or that other people are reading his report to try to do what the witch-hunter could not do?

When was he indicted and on what charge?



gig









.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Not going to read all that

Sorry, stopped reading right there.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Sorry, stopped reading right there.

Correction: You stopped where my post requested that you post what Mueller had indicted Trump on- despite the flurry of links to crabwalk away from it.

But that's fine. You and SpikeTarder have assured us that when Mueller testifies it will say that he did that but just forgot to put it in the report or something.

Tards/all

 

[WeToddDid2]

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html?mcubz=0

Bush Pardons 6 in Iran Affair, Aborting a Weinberger Trial; Prosecutor Assails 'Cover-Up'

Six years after the arms-for-hostages scandal began to cast a shadow that would darken two Administrations, President Bush today granted full pardons to six former officials in Ronald Reagan's Administration, including former Defense Secretary Caspar W. Weinberger.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Correction: You stopped where my post requested that you post what Mueller had indicted Trump on- despite the flurry of links to crabwalk away from it.

Are you really a moron, or do you just play one on the Internet?

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Are you really a moron, or do you just play one on the Internet?

So, no to the indictment then?

Or you are just able to see it with your Special Jerry Nadler Batman Decoder Ring?