CNN continues their operation as the Pravda News Nework.

I was really wondering how CNN was going to try to shit on Trump even though the jobs numbers have been fantastic so far, so what do they do? They lie and come out with propaganda saying that Trump doesnt believe the monthly jobs report.

This is all because Trump like many other people has pointed out what a joke the official unemployment number is. Obama barely even averaged the 125000 jobs per month which is the "breakeven" number just to create enough jobs to make up for the new people entering the workforce every single month, yet somehow the unemployment number dropped from over 10% to under 5%.

Are liberals really delusional enough to believe we were living in a rip roaring, bubble like economy where jobs were just getting added hand over fist under Obama? If Obama was infact this gigantic boon to the economy, why is it that democrats lost more seats than any time in modern history under his watch? Why is it that wage growth under was basically 0 if there was so much demand for labor under Obama?

Its pretty funny because the employment numbers, and consumer confidence numbers are clearly skyrocketing under Trump and he has barely done anything yet, other than the fact that it is a foregone conclusion that he is getting rid of Obamacare and the employer mandate, which was probably the biggest job killer in history.

I was wondering how Pravda(CNN) would spin the jobs numbers, and all the positives in the economy, got my answer today.

 
Last edited:
I was really wondering how CNN was going to try to shit on Trump even though the jobs numbers have been fantastic so far, so what do they do? They lie and come out with propaganda saying that Trump doesnt believe the monthly jobs report.
You're the Pravda.

The job report, while good, is similar to what it had been in February 2016 and the year before that. So let's not make it more than it is.

Trump has said time and again that he didn't believe the unemployment rate:


But now he believes it?

What else you got, Pravda?
 
Not believing the unemployment number is not the same thing as not believing the jobs number, i have never heard Trump saying that he didnt believe 150k jobs were created last month.

The economic numbers are the real deal bro, there is more than just 1 jobs number, consumer confidence is skyrocketing, the easiest money trade in the world right now is betting on the jobs number and waiting for the gap up the next morning. Though i learned today you should probably just dump the gap up and take the free money, instead of watching it evaporate all day.

CNBC, and many other Wallstreet news sources are now talking about the possibility of multiple rate hikes this year, even though we were barely able to limp through 1 rate hike after years of putting it off under Obama. If there is no pickup in economic activity why is the fed suddenly shifting gears to the possibility of multiple rate hikes, when they could barely even do 1 under Obama? Why didnt wages grow for 8 years?

You're the Pravda.

The job report, while good, is similar to what it had been in February 2016 and the year before that. So let's not make it more than it is.

Trump has said time and again that he didn't believe the unemployment rate:


But now he believes it?

What else you got, Pravda?
 
Last edited:
Do you remember where the economy was 8 years ago? When a person falls out of a 3-story window, he doesn't just get up, dust himself off and go about his business.


Actually statistics show that after a horrible recession, jobs numbers tend to be higher, so Obama has no excuse.
 
Timing. They say Trump is unleashing animal spirits. But animal spirits were locked up for 8 years and ready to break out and the Trump victory was the signal that the timing is right. They say a Comanche without a horse is a pathetic sight. You could say the same thing about Trump and his credit card.
 
Actually statistics show that after a horrible recession, jobs numbers tend to be higher, so Obama has no excuse.
After a recession? And what about during the worst one in generations rather than your typical run-of-the-mill? In trading parlance, let's not compare a minor pullback to a several-year low.

All things considered, I'd say that Obama comported himself fairly well:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms
 
ha, ha, Clinton Bush Obama were all successful in that they accomplished their goal which was to be elected President. Now all Trump can do to be a success is to get re elected in 2020. And CNN is all over it. Their autopsy goes something like, We really failed. What can we do in 2020 to make ordinary people, the Steel worker in PA, agree with us?
 
After a recession? And what about during the worst one in generations rather than your typical run-of-the-mill? In trading parlance, let's not compare a minor pullback to a several-year low.

All things considered, I'd say that Obama comported himself fairly well:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms


The worse the recession, the better the snapback, this applies to jobs, stock market, individual stocks, basically everything. Obama and Bush were the only two who were incompetent enough to screw this up.
 
After a recession? And what about during the worst one in generations rather than your typical run-of-the-mill? In trading parlance, let's not compare a minor pullback to a several-year low.

All things considered, I'd say that Obama comported himself fairly well:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms

It was the weakest recovery after a recession.....EVER!

Household income stagnant.

More part time jobs and many of them are now "career's" and not by choice.

If Obama "comported himself" so well, then why did Hillary lose so bigly?
 
Back
Top