CNBC Debate: Not Again, Rick

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

The CNBC debate last night from Michigan produced one noteworthy moment and little else of substance.

Let's get the big flub out of the way. Rick Perry was attempting to make a dramatic point about how he would cut the federal budget by eliminating three departments, certainly a worthy goal. Unfortunately, he drew a complete blank when he got to the third department. This was not an ad lib gone awry by Perry. He uses this line in almost all his stump speeches. It was just one of those horrible moments that you desperately hope never happens to you in front of a crowd of people.

The conventional wisdom is that it marked the end of a troubled campaign for Perry. His impressive list of accomplishments as governor of Texas...

Lol, the end of this one.
 
Quote from Wallet:


Paul, regrettably is ignored by the media, they don't want to hear the truth.

This is interesting...

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/321-be-honest-cnbc-you-are-biased-against-ron-paul

"We had a poll up from our Republican Presidential Debate asking readers who they thought won. One candidate was leading by such a margin that it became obvious the polling wasn't so much a reading of our audience, but of the Internet prowess of this particular candidate's political organization. We have therefore taken the poll down."

Guess who was leading the poll...? :D
 
Quote from MarketMasher:

This is interesting...

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/321-be-honest-cnbc-you-are-biased-against-ron-paul

"We had a poll up from our Republican Presidential Debate asking readers who they thought won. One candidate was leading by such a margin that it became obvious the polling wasn't so much a reading of our audience, but of the Internet prowess of this particular candidate's political organization. We have therefore taken the poll down."

Guess who was leading the poll...? :D

So if too many Ron Paul supporters vote it is considered distorted.
Would they remove a poll if the overwhelming vote was for Romney?


http://www.huntingtonnews.net/13043
 
Quote from pspr:

AAA, you should be writing for a newspaper or a big time blog. Your analysis and writing skills are that good.

Yes AAA is a good writer but a very biased writer. Describes Obama as slick tongued instead of competent and a fine debater. And thinking Newt won the exchange with Maria is just flat out wrong. Newt knows how these debates work , there isn't time to go into debth on any subject, he was being a condescending ass and will not be the nominee, which is too bad because he is smart and competent and I think Newt realizes if president he would work with both sides of the aisle as a president should.

Even though Cain will not be the nominee for the republicans I did read where be is applying for the vacant Penn State head football coaches job.
 
ROFL! You called AAA "very biased" and then claimed Odumbo is competent? Competent at what? Lying and breaking campaign promises? Dividing the country and class warfare? Redistributing wealth and socialism? "Leading" the country in the wrong direction? Over-regulating? Keeping unemployment high? Suing states that try to deal with the federal government's failures? Etc., etc.
Quote from bigarrow:

Yes AAA is a good writer but a very biased writer. Describes Obama as slick tongued instead of competent and a fine debater.
 
Quote from Trader666:

ROFL! You called AAA biased and then claimed Odumbo is competent? Competent at what? Lying and breaking campaign promises? Dividing the country and class warfare? Redistributing wealth and socialism? "Leading" the country in the wrong direction? Over-regulating? Keeping unemployment high? Suing states that try to deal with the federal government's failures? Etc., etc.

All righties are not created equal, AAA is smart and even his biased posts he puts some thought behind them. And when he is wrong he is pleasant to talk to, you are not in that group.
 
First, he's not wrong and second, I don't suffer fools gladly and don't want to be pleasant to mental defectives like you.
Quote from bigarrow:

All righties are not created equal, AAA is smart and even his biased posts he puts some thought behind them. And when he is wrong he is pleasant to talk to, you are not in that group.
 
To call Ron Paul an outsider is either biased or misinformed. Ron is constantly in the top 3 of the stupid phone polls, always number 1 in online polls, raises more money than most of the candidated (even Herman Cain) and gets more money from active military than the entire Pub field combined
To call Paul an outsider is just flat wrong.
 
Back
Top