CNBC clueless

Quote from flytiger:

I will say one thing, good about them. Liz Clayman was on with this tight, tight sweater and those big, big breasts, and she turned sideways, and I lost my breath. I mean, in a good way.

Doc says I need more anerobic excercise. I'm good for today.

Whew:eek:

I guess that's two good things. See, they're better already.

Michelle is healthy also. What ever happened to Melissa Francis?
 
Quote from cashmoney69:
Isn't CNBC owned by GM?...haha

General Electric. That gem of a stock has really performed well in the last couple years.


Quote from HoundDogOne:

People miss the point of CNBC.

It is a pure PROPAGANDA organ for the Securities Industry.
They put on the Propaganda Ministers from the NYSE and every Major Firm...
Then Liz lobs softball questions at them while they stare at her boobs.

30% of the content is extremely manipulative Broker advertising.

Case in point:

CNBC did not cover... (or maybe gave it 10 seconds)...
The criminal trials of the NYSE Floor Governors and Specialists that were convicted.

In contrast...
A CEO has his perp walk shown over and over and over on CNBC.

lmao.

So true.
 
Quote from HoundDogOne:

Bob Pisani is Top Dog.
He proves it all night long on "Pisani After Dark".

<IMG SRC = "http://www.gogomag.com/bp2/x_bobpisani2.jpg">

What!!

You sayin that Bob's the top shagger?
 
Quote from ess1096:

This is exactly the edge that Marty Schwartz says he uses in his book "Pit Bull". I am getting very interested in this bond to equities theory.

Holy, I don't suppose you could elaborate on this strategy or point me towards more info on it? Thanks.

I've never read any of his books. There really isn't anything "magical" about the theory. You just have to keep up with what consensus earnings are forecasted for the S&P, and then compare it to what bonds are yielding. Then you have to keep up with each earnings season to determine if the earnings are meeting up to those expectations.

Right now consensus earnings growth for the s&p for 2007 is pretty much in the high 1 digit. You can call the range 7-9%, but most are expecting 9. That yield if it comes to fruition is almost 2 times the current bond yield. Is getting twice the annual guaranteed rate of treasuries worth the risk ? I would think most people would answer yes to that question. Therefore the stockmarket will go up this year as long as bond yields do not rise from their present condition, and most s&P companies are growing their earnings at least 9% year over year(including dividends).

This is why everyone gets concerned with fed speak. They are hoping to get a clue as to the fed's next move. They can already see what the future of earnings are looking like, but they cannot determine what the fed is thinking.

If earnings turn out to be around 7% instead of 9%, and the fed continues to talk tough on inflation, or tries to save the dollar by raising rates then the market will drop, but nothing big until the fed actually raises rates. Each percentage move a bond makes closer to actual yields of the s&p take more people out of the market who are risk averse.
 
Quote from HolyGrail:

I've never read any of his books. There really isn't anything "magical" about the theory. You just have to keep up with what consensus earnings are forecasted for the S&P, and then compare it to what bonds are yielding. Then you have to keep up with each earnings season to determine if the earnings are meeting up to those expectations.


Right now, the BOND market is at nearly a historical extreme in relationship to where the S&P is trading. In fact, BONDS are at the same place right now, as stocks were back in March of 2000.
 
Quote from flytiger:

Liz Clayman was on with this tight, tight sweater and those big, big breasts, and she turned sideways. . .

I caught that too this morning. Delicious that she knows to do that. I'm waiting for Carl or Joe to say "sweater puppies."
 
Quote from Chood:

I caught that too this morning. Delicious that she knows to do that. I'm waiting for Carl or Joe to say "sweater puppies."

How could she not know it? Walk around with your kid's backpack stuffed w/books on your front. Tell me you don't notice it.

I wonder what they called Pisani in High School? What sort of taunting nickname could come f rom "Pisani"???
 
No way they are that heavy. We're not talking frozen chuck here. Now if you're talking pendulous, yes, I would agree, no question.

Quote from flytiger:

How could she not know it? Walk around with your kid's backpack stuffed w/books on your front. Tell me you don't notice it. . .
 
Quote from Chood:

No way they are that heavy. We're not talking frozen chuck here. Now if you're talking pendulous, yes, I would agree, no question.

pendulous. I think I need a cold shower.

Pendulous. Pendulous. Not heavy, or floppy,........... pendulou-ss-s-s-s--s-s-sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss----
 
Back
Top