Quote from lilduckling:
Reagan was indeed the greatest president since Kennedy ..... That is well established by BOTH Reps and Dems .... there is no question about it!!!! Anyone who even suggests otherwise, is not a student of politics and just an idealog.
Reagan was president when I was in the military..... I was assigned to the Warsaw Pact Line if war ever broke out.... I, WE, would've gone to hell and back for Reagan. Something I cant say for any other president.
I cried when Reagan died.
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
What was so great about Reagan? The cult of personality of Reagan requires republicans to build a mausoleum since they seem to be stuck in the 80s.
Quote from Jayford:
How about the cult of Clinton?
easily the same.
balanced budget? In spite of him not because of him. He was in no way in favor of this until until '94 when newt and Co. decimated Dem controlled congress on a balanced budget platform. THEN he was all for it. he had the tech boom revenues behind him which made such a difficult prospect easy, and then left office shortly after the bust in march of 2000.
The general public credits Clinton for a balanced budget and booming economy when it had nothing to do with him. its the same thing.
Before you attack me as a right wing nut job, I should state that I now hate both parties. Spend spend spend. And lets be as bi partisan as possible.
I just call it as I see it.
Jayford
Quote from Jayford:
How about the cult of Clinton?
easily the same.
balanced budget? In spite of him not because of him. He was in no way in favor of this until until '94 when newt and Co. decimated Dem controlled congress on a balanced budget platform. THEN he was all for it. he had the tech boom revenues behind him which made such a difficult prospect easy, and then left office shortly after the bust in march of 2000.
The general public credits Clinton for a balanced budget and booming economy when it had nothing to do with him. its the same thing.
Before you attack me as a right wing nut job, I should state that I now hate both parties. Spend spend spend. And lets be as bi partisan as possible.
I just call it as I see it.
Jayford
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
I'll admit she was terrible in the Couric interview, but I find it insulting that a woman whose job consists of reading stuff off a teleprompter presumes to act like she is somehow intellectually superior. As far as I know Couric doesn't have a Harvard PHD, and frnakly, I doubt she stays up nights reading articles in Foreign Affairs. But then, I'm pretty sure Reagan didn't either and he was the greatest president of my lifetime.
Palin's problem is not that she's dumb. It's that she's too honest. A Biden would have rattled off a half dozen serious sounding publications he saw on the rack at the newstand, while he was under fire in Afghanistan.
You look back at presidents, and I defy you to draw a correlation between intelligence and how successful they were as presidents. Two of the smartest were Nixon and Clinton. No one would say they were great presidents. One got forced out of office, the other almost did and disgraced his office in numerous ways. No one would put Reagan and Truman at the top of any list of intellectuals, and they acquitted themselves very well in office. JFK was polished but not overly bright either, and people loved him. Jimmy Carter was a brilliant, accomplished man but a terrible president. I could go on. Qualities like judgment, courage and the ability to inspire trust are far more important than mastering a lot of arcane facts. Choosing a good staff is essential. Being lucky helps a lot too.
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
I'll admit she was terrible in the Couric interview, but I find it insulting that a woman whose job consists of reading stuff off a teleprompter presumes to act like she is somehow intellectually superior. As far as I know Couric doesn't have a Harvard PHD, and frnakly, I doubt she stays up nights reading articles in Foreign Affairs. But then, I'm pretty sure Reagan didn't either and he was the greatest president of my lifetime.
Palin's problem is not that she's dumb. It's that she's too honest. A Biden would have rattled off a half dozen serious sounding publications he saw on the rack at the newstand, while he was under fire in Afghanistan.
You look back at presidents, and I defy you to draw a correlation between intelligence and how successful they were as presidents. Two of the smartest were Nixon and Clinton. No one would say they were great presidents. One got forced out of office, the other almost did and disgraced his office in numerous ways. No one would put Reagan and Truman at the top of any list of intellectuals, and they acquitted themselves very well in office. JFK was polished but not overly bright either, and people loved him. Jimmy Carter was a brilliant, accomplished man but a terrible president. I could go on. Qualities like judgment, courage and the ability to inspire trust are far more important than mastering a lot of arcane facts. Choosing a good staff is essential. Being lucky helps a lot too.
Quote from kut2k2:
Another rightwinger full of fantasy.
Clinton signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 in August 1993, which passed Congress without a Republican vote. It cut taxes for fifteen million low-income families, made tax cuts available to 90% of small businesses, and raised taxes on the wealthiest 1.2% of taxpayers. Additionally, through the implementation of spending restraints, it mandated the budget be balanced over a number of years.
I wonder what color the sky is in your world, because it surely must be different from the sky here on Earth.