Hmm...there's a distressing similarity in punctuation and usage on a lot of those reports. I mean, it's better than what you'd expect in a sampling of internet users generally...even in a professional setting. I'd discount some of them certainly. Has this been sourced otherwise? The cited source doesn't scream independent and unbiased in it's name. In fact, it really doesn't strike me as a site that would be something someone would go to before deciding where to eat. Point being, CMG saw fit to react to this, and news media is reporting only that they decided to close the store. I don't see where news organizations have verified underlying reports independently. That said, I haven't dug that deep, but nor have I seen this reported in outfits with particularly stringent sourcing criteria.
Doesn't change my sentiment, only my timeline.