CME changes margin req to INITIAL = MAINTENANCE !?!?!?

So that alarmist rag ZH breaks this story, all the comments insinuate this is some contrived margin call to squeeze long metals positions.

Now they flip-flop and imply the change will cause a gross expansion of risk as if speculators will suddenly open positions Monday with the windfall expansion of leverage the disparity between initial/maint offers them.

In their infinite stupidity ZH fails to mention with the exception of a few products "evil" exchange members never have to post initial margin to begin with (only maintenance). So IMO this is just a protection being offered to retail accounts facing liquidation through no fault of their own because of MF transfers.

I can't believe anyone reads this shit. This is a nonevent and just a small temporary added protection for the little guy, kudos to CME.
 
ZH frequently and often, not to mention regularly, over the top.


Tyler?
1ab109a6_tbash-3.jpeg
 
Quote from atrocious:

This is a nonevent and just a small temporary added protection for the little guy, kudos to CME.

Agreed - the last thing I would expect CME to do is to disrupt orderly markets. That is the opposite of what they want.

This is a temporary accommodation, so that firms which require 100% of Initial margin for overnite positions are not forced to liquidate their newly-acquired MF clients' positions immediately upon receiving the account.

Many firms require 100% of Initial margin to carry an overnite position (mine does), but apparently MF did not - creating a problem for the transfer process.

Keep in mind that most risk-management systems would not trim a position until it was back within margin guidelines - it would just liquidate the entire position immediately. So rather than trying to re-write everyone's risk-management software over the weekend, it's just easier to lower margins to avoid mass auto-liquidation.
 
Back
Top