ok, who's the asshole pennying me in WSBK?????
CLSR is a winner!
- Thread starter mrmarket
- Start date
Quote from CONTRARIAN:
I think that what everybody is saying is Forget the HYPE and just start a journal like that of :
marketsurfer
canibus
random trader
tango29
damir00
and myself. Post trades in advance or atleast possible entry points and/or working orders to buy/sell.
gotta go.
I'm not going to go through the effort again of starting a journal and all of a sudden seeing ET shut it down. Smart people, like AAA, know where to look for my picks and trades.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=24941
why is mr. monkey continuously allowed to spam his pathetic website? Don't take my adjective for it, fall into the monkey trap and go there and see for yourself.
Baron
ET Founder
If you're journals got shut down in the past, it was because you were pimping your website instead of posting legitimate picks. You and I both know this.
You are welcome to start a journal as long as you post all of your picks in real time before they become winners/losers. Your entry point must be indicated as well, so it can be compared with the time stamp of your post for validation.
Nice DODGE again. 
Get a clue Mr Market.... you already made it PAINFULLY
clear with your 10% = 10% answer, that your knowledge
of the markets are extremely shallow, and that Wharton
did nothing to help you with basic market knowledge.
It's simply AMAZING to me that someone who holds his
little wharton degree to such high standards is also
completely incapable of calculating a simple percentage return.
Either you are embarrassed to tell us what your actual returns
are, or your precious wharton didn't teach you enough
math to do a simple computation.
In any case.... it's hilarious watching you DODGE DODGE DODGE
the simplest of questions with your subject changes
and grandstanding.
You have FRAUD written all over your face.
I'm done toying with you now. You have proven beyond
a reasonable doubt that your full of it.
Your wharton professors would be so proud
As for the "thin letter", I certainly never received one
since Wharton isn't a computer science school.
Although, given your lack of simple mathematical skills,
I suspect YOU may in fact have received such a thin
letter and are lying about your degree, the same way
you lie about your returns.
peace
axeman
Get a clue Mr Market.... you already made it PAINFULLY
clear with your 10% = 10% answer, that your knowledge
of the markets are extremely shallow, and that Wharton
did nothing to help you with basic market knowledge.
It's simply AMAZING to me that someone who holds his
little wharton degree to such high standards is also
completely incapable of calculating a simple percentage return.
Either you are embarrassed to tell us what your actual returns
are, or your precious wharton didn't teach you enough
math to do a simple computation.
In any case.... it's hilarious watching you DODGE DODGE DODGE
the simplest of questions with your subject changes
and grandstanding.
You have FRAUD written all over your face.
I'm done toying with you now. You have proven beyond
a reasonable doubt that your full of it.
Your wharton professors would be so proud
As for the "thin letter", I certainly never received one
since Wharton isn't a computer science school.
Although, given your lack of simple mathematical skills,
I suspect YOU may in fact have received such a thin
letter and are lying about your degree, the same way
you lie about your returns.
peace
axeman
I don't know why so many of you take the bait and reply to MM. If you ignore him I suspect he'd get tired of replying to himself. And as far as his 15% gains ... I laughed when I saw at least one "trade" that was well over a year in holding and thus equated to a gain of LESS than 15% on an annualized basis. Also, anyone who has a clue knows we've been in a strong uptrending market the last 9 months ... so to claim he has "x" number of winners isn't all that impressive.
I did that in a time sequence at one point a while back.
The posts were deleted by the moderator.
I determined that MM prevailed in his complaints to the moderator. ho cares.
What I determined t that point in time was that the portfolio was constantly increased with infusions of cpital and then when the "holds" filledall but one or two of the up to 14 slots, that the total capital dclined faster thn the sells @ 15% per turn.
The ratio of losses in up to 13 streams outweighed the gains in the 2 active streams.
Throughout most of he time MM hs posted he has been adding money streams. Lately he invests in a constant set of 15 streams (Since the last restart) and gradually the balance of "holds" to active streams is shifting.
Holds are defined as over 6 weeks nd mlingering; active means empty or just filled and under 6 weeks in process.
He must do picks at the rate of 6 every ten days to keep his strategy a pace of the time passing.
his strategy is now encountering serious unrecovrable failure for two reasons. His ratio of hols is continually increasing an he is not maintaining enough entries because of failing to make enough picks.
I have concluded that he is not actually mintaining a real investmentaccount as hes says he is. He has slipped up so many times with conflicting statement and sudden restarts attributued to getting thrown off web sites, etc. MM is not for real it turns out once you et up his stuff on excel and run it from his historical record using nominal captal values.
Several others have drawn the same conclusions.