Clown Shoes: Raising the debt ceiling does not increase our debt.

Quote from stoic:

So..... If my credit card company sends me a notice that they have raised my line of credit from $10k to $15k and I then use that credit to pay my interest and once again max out my credit card, I should expect that my "load" minimum payment on the new debt to go down???? That's just as stupid as what Odumbo said.

Actually we should not be surprised. Before civilization, stupid people did not survive so people got smarter. With civilization, the stupid survived and made more stupid people. Now stupid people tend to have more children. Over time stupid people became the majority. It was only a matter of time for the dim-witted majority to elect a stupid person as President.

This has got to be post of the year! With your permission, I'd like to copy and paste it to some emails.
 
Quote from bigarrow:

You guys don't know the difference between the debt and the debt ceiling. But your specialty is in bitching and moaning and not thinking.

Could you think and reason with this:

6915213993_42b1bca8ec_z.jpg


My god people, its the gays, debt, Those People, Obamacare, Bill Clinton, the Community Reinvestment Act, teachers' unions, etc. etc.. that are destroying america.

What we need are : more guns, prayer in school, pray away the gay, keep Those People in the projects and out of the suburbs, even more guns, etc.. etc.. etc..
 
Quote from Covertibility:

Could you think and reason with this:

6915213993_42b1bca8ec_z.jpg


My god people, its the gays, debt, Those People, Obamacare, Bill Clinton, the Community Reinvestment Act, teachers' unions, etc. etc.. that are destroying america.

What we need are : more guns, prayer in school, pray away the gay, keep Those People in the projects and out of the suburbs, even more guns, etc.. etc.. etc..

Look at the disinformation you are willing to post...

As you leftists rot out the core of our cities, city by city with your education programs which try to dumb down the smart kids. with your tax the working people to death and give it to the non workers who vote for your terrible policies.

Look at your constitution destroying stop and frisk police states and your crazy attempts to use every tragedy to take away the guns that protect us for the tyranny the rulers of the left would like to inflict.
 
Quote from bigarrow:

32. Commercial airline pilot
105.6

My IQ is higher than the airline pilots listed in your link....
So is mine.
And as proof I embarked on a career commensurate with my IQ.

You? LOL :D


attachment.php
 
Quote from Covertibility:

...My god people, its the gays, debt, Those People, Obamacare, Bill Clinton, the Community Reinvestment Act, teachers' unions, etc. etc.. that are destroying america.

What we need are : more guns, prayer in school, pray away the gay, keep Those People in the projects and out of the suburbs, even more guns, etc.. etc.. etc..

THIS my friends is what stupid looks like - on drugs.
 
Quote from stoic:

Then tell us all how it works.... but be advised, keep it based on reality.
No need to recruit help with "us all", Tsing, for one, immediately understood what I was getting at. What a person owes has little meaning until you know what that person earns, then you have an idea of their burden, aka their load. So to oversimplify, lumping whole classes of assets and liabilities together for the sake of illustration, consider DL = D/I, where DL is debt load, D is debt and I is income. In what circumstance could DL be falling even as D is increasing?
 
Lets also be clear the Obama was not talking about debt load.

Lets also be clear. Democrats are being disingenous on this subject.

If the Senate Dems allowed a budget and voted on spending then this debate about cuts and taxes would be had and americans could be informed and vote for reps based on their budget vote.

As Congress was passing a budget theycould tack on and increase the debt ceiling vote. (like the gephardt rule).

But, without a budget debate and a budget the ceiling is where the budget control argument must now happen.





Quote from Ricter:

No need to recruit help with "us all", Tsing, for one, immediately understood what I was getting at. What a person owes has little meaning until you know what that person earns, then you have an idea of their burden, aka their load. So to oversimplify, lumping whole classes of assets and liabilities together for the sake of illustration, consider DL = D/I, where DL is debt load, D is debt and I is income. In what circumstance could DL be falling even as D is increasing?
 
Back
Top