Close the Border you traitors - before you get us killed

Scataphagos said:
What we need is (1) an outbreak of ebola at some elementary school.... kill off about 50 children, and parents across the country will finally stand up and shout, "FUCK YOU OBAMA... YOUR BULLSHIT POLICIES ARE KILLING OUR CHILDREN! " and/or (2) on some year's 9/11, there will be a mass bombing... 1,000 bombs set off at a coordinated time. Schools, shopping malls, sports stadiums, airports, etc.... you know, from all the jihadists Odumbo allowed to cross the southern border unchecked.

Isn't it that a country's government and its president's #1 priority is to to DEFEND AND PROTECT ITS CITIZENS? Or am I wrong about that?

If not wrong, what do you call a president who needlessly exposes his country's citizens to fatal disease and violent death from foreigners?

:(
More...

You're correct about the US President's #1 priority. Now where is the impeachment by the Republicans in Congress? Oh, that's right, they'd have to worry about being re-elected.. Ok... And I'm a registered Republican, and am PISSED OFF!!!!
(Yeah, I know. Ever hear democrats say they're pissed at their own? Lol!! Look at the troll nazicrats we have here. They'd go down with the ship before EVER saying "the captain" is wrong..)
 
dbphoenix said:
Which, again, is the same Fox News item quoted by your "major news sources" like "examiner", which is what you used to begin with.

As for FACTS that no ISIS terrorist have [sic] not crossed, the statements made by DHS qualify as FACTS, as do the statements by the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Mexican embassy. You just don't happen to like them. OTOH, you have yet to provide a single FACT to support your contention that IS terrorists have crossed the border into Texas.

Let's go, doughey. Can you come up with anything better than Fox News? Can you provide any of those FACTS that you value so highly? Anything? Even the National Review doesn't buy this story.
More...

And you have provided NO FACTS!!

As previously stated if you believe what Homeland Security says .. well, that shows how ignorant you truly are .. but we already knew that.

Do you have any clue as to how many times a governmental agency has lied to the public so as to hide or work behind the scenes to cover their ass?
 
 
LEAPup said:
Now where is the impeachment by the Republicans in Congress? Oh, that's right, they'd have to worry about being re-elected.. Ok... And I'm a registered Republican, and am PISSED OFF!!!!
More...
Congressmen Booze As Government Shutdown Looms


Here Leap.
------------------------

House Republicans spent hours on Capitol Hill Saturday as a government shutdown loomed, but that didn't stop some of them from having a little weekend fun.

Reporters tweeted that they could see -- and smell -- several Congressmen enjoying a drink while working:

Republicans are shutting down the government over their opposition to health care reform. After the bill passed the House in 2010, Democrats did plenty of boozing themselves, much of it at The Tune Inn, a dive bar just blocks from the Capitol, but plenty of it inside the building as well.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/28/government-shutdown_n_4010592.html
 
A global health professor at Georgetown University expressed concern this week that new measures announced to keep Ebola out of the United States are merely a response to "political outcry" meant to make the public believe the government is working to prevent its spread, not actual proven methods of securing our travel.
Professor Larry Gostin told Minnesota Public Radio this week that many of the new safeguards in American airports have failed elsewhere around the world, and while they may make Americans feel safer, they might not necessarily make a difference.

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) announced this week that five major airports would now require of passengers to undergo "enhanced" screening for Ebola, which includes a health questionnaire, temperature measurements, and receipt of reading materials for "self-monitoring" once released from the airport. Gostin argued that these sorts of measures are often a "reply to that political outcry" that follows a negative turn in public sentiment. Governments around the world, he argued, are "under a lot of pressure to do something [to] make the public feel reassured, even if it really doesn't make them safer."

"Fever screening can be unobtrusive, but let's not have the false impression that this is a tried-and-true method and it's going to keep Ebola out of the United States," he tells MPR, "It's just not the case." He added that he did not believe there was much evidence indicating that checking passengers for fever has successfully prevented anyone from traveling due to having contracted Ebola, and that some countries, now knowing of enhanced screenings, even provide passengers with medication on the plane to keep their temperatures down.

During the recent outbreak of SARS in the country, one Chinese airline, Gostin recalls, gave passengers acetaminophen on the plane to ensure they would pass temperature screenings upon arriving in the United States from Beijing.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/...g-An-Inefficient-Response-to-Political-Outcry
 
Spike Trader said:
Congressmen Booze As Government Shutdown Looms


Here Leap.
------------------------

House Republicans spent hours on Capitol Hill Saturday as a government shutdown loomed, but that didn't stop some of them from having a little weekend fun.

Reporters tweeted that they could see -- and smell -- several Congressmen enjoying a drink while working:

Republicans are shutting down the government over their opposition to health care reform. After the bill passed the House in 2010, Democrats did plenty of boozing themselves, much of it at The Tune Inn, a dive bar just blocks from the Capitol, but plenty of it inside the building as well.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/28/government-shutdown_n_4010592.html
More...

Year old stuff .. thanks!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_in_the_Past_(album)
 
LEAPup said:
You're correct about the US President's #1 priority. Now where is the impeachment by the Republicans in Congress? Oh, that's right, they'd have to worry about being re-elected.. Ok... And I'm a registered Republican, and am PISSED OFF!!!!
(Yeah, I know. Ever hear democrats say they're pissed at their own? Lol!! Look at the troll nazicrats we have here. They'd go down with the ship before EVER saying "the captain" is wrong..)
More...

Wouldn't do any good for the House to impeach. The trial would be in the Senate... and with a Dem majority there... well, you know.

No chance of a successful impeachment unless the Repubs control the Senate.

Personally, should the Repubs take the Senate next month, I'd like to see Congress' FIRST order of business to be Odumbo's impeachment! If any president ever deserved it, he does.
 
Last edited:
DHOHHI said:
And you have provided NO FACTS!!

As previously stated if you believe what Homeland Security says .. well, that shows how ignorant you truly are .. but we already knew that.

Do you have any clue as to how many times a governmental agency has lied to the public so as to hide or work behind the scenes to cover their ass?
More...

You haven't provided any FACTS!! either. Given a choice between a Repub who isn't getting any support from anybody and the DHS, the Tx Dept of Public Safety and the Mexican embassy, I'll take the latter. If you prefer the former, you're even more a paranoid wingnut conspiracist than I thought.
 
A war veteran Congressman with a secure seat or this administration who told us

our rates would go down
we could keep our doctor
who lied about Susan Rice's talking points
who lied about the WH not being involved with secret service prostitutes
who lied about benghazi
who condones hard drives and texts to be wiped over at the IRS

its not even a contest.
one side - has a history of lying.




Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus is a legal maxim which means false in one thing, false in everything. A Roman legal principle indicating that a witness who willfully falsifies one matter is not credible on any matter. The underlying motive for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: the principle discredits the rest of their testimony if it is without corroboration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top