CLINTON v BUSH

TM_Direct · Mar 28, 2003

Everyone is so angry on one side of the war or the other.....I haven't seen people take sides like this since......the election of 2000.....Hmmmmmmmm.....?????????

answer honestly and only answer the question:

If this was Clinton doing this, would you support it?....and if not would you take to the streets to protest it?

In the meantime, can't we all just get along and learn how to be compassionate and kind like me????

MRWSM · Mar 28, 2003

I would still support him and our troops. One thing I liked about what Clinton did is he didn't ask nobody, didn't mess with the UN he just went in and bombed Bosnia. Also liked the way he won that war from the air only when everyone was saying you can't win an air only war.

I think we can beat Iraq with only air forces. Might take longer but it's possible.

Besides all that I support GW Bush, best President we've had since Reagan.

MondoTrader · Mar 28, 2003

Neither Clinton or Gore would have done this, but just to answer your hypothetical question, YES I would have supported this war regardless.

this is just doing what should have been done in 1991 but we let the U.N. and the French talk us out of it.

TM_Direct · Mar 28, 2003

I would have supported it....but.......I would be skeptical if he was doing it in the month or two leading up to his impeachment trial.

MondoTrader · Mar 28, 2003

I never liked Clinton, but I was in favor of his military actions in Bosnia and Serbia, and NONE of the liberals criticized that AT ALL.
The Evil in Iraq is on a much larger scale and has been going on much longer, but since BUSH is pres., the liberals are willing to be human shields. That shows you exactly how their minds work.

MRWSM · Mar 28, 2003

TM, I don't think even Clinton would be low enough to put our forces at risk for his own benefit. At least I would hope not.

rs7 · Mar 28, 2003

Quote from MondoTrader:

I never liked Clinton,

Wow!!!! This comes as a major shock to us all!!!!!

Who'd of thougth Mondo would feel that way??

Quote from MondoTrader:

Neither Clinton or Gore would have done this,

And you know this because??

TM_Direct · Mar 31, 2003

Quote from MRWSM:

TM, I don't think even Clinton would be low enough to put our forces at risk for his own benefit. At least I would hope not.

Are you suree about that? Had to admit, I found it 'odd' that on the eve of his impeachment vote...he started a military action against IRAQ that delayed the vote for a week....becuase republicans thought it was the right thisng to do...to wait...

dgabriel · Mar 31, 2003

Quote from MondoTrader:

I never liked Clinton, but I was in favor of his military actions in Bosnia and Serbia, and NONE of the liberals criticized that AT ALL.
The Evil in Iraq is on a much larger scale and has been going on much longer, but since BUSH is pres., the liberals are willing to be human shields. That shows you exactly how their minds work.

The Evil in Iraq is certainly not on a larger scale. The genocide in the former Yugoslavia was far greater and claimed far more victims than the dead at the hands of Hussein.

And you can't compare the US miiltary actions in Bosnia/Serbia to Iraq.

TM_Direct · Mar 31, 2003

Quote from dgabriel:

The Evil in Iraq is certainly not on a larger scale. The genocide in the former Yugoslavia was far greater and claimed far more victims than the dead at the hands of Hussein.

And you can't compare the US miiltary actions in Bosnia/Serbia to Iraq.

Where did you get this info from??? Im just curious as to the figures....how many have perished in Yugo vs the Iraq regime?...I really don't know that's why Im asking