Clinton opens up double-digit lead over Trump in new poll
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
Yeah, we'll really see what Trump's made of at the debates, seeing as how his skin is so tissue-thin. For your sake I hope he doesn't cry, or complain how unfair Hillary is because she's a woman and she likes Mexican food.
Last edited:
revenues went up, under reagan... form $517 billion in 1980 to $909 billion in 1988
if all of sudden the budget means somethign to you Ricter... and that is a laugh considering you have been a krugman fan boy... the issue with the budget was spending... not tax cuts.
So now what is your point about how much obama has spent compared to Reagan?
--
this was as of last year... it is now expected to be 20 trillion in debt. Obama has just about doubled a massive debt.
The total federal debt, which was $18,722,746,583,118.03 at the close of business on Monday, now equals about $159,007 per household.
It has increased approximately $68,756 per household during Obama’s presidency.
On Jan. 20, 2009, when Obama was inaugurated, the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08. On Nov. 23, 2015, it was $18,722,746,583,118.03 Thus, so far in Obama’s presidency, the federal debt has increased $8,095,869,534,204.95.
As of September, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were 117,748,000 households in the United States. The $18,722,746,583,118.03 in federal debt equals $159,006.91 for each one of those households.
The $8,095,869,534,204.95 that the debt has increased under Obama equals about 68,755.90 for each one of those households.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/debt-under-obama-8000000000000
if all of sudden the budget means somethign to you Ricter... and that is a laugh considering you have been a krugman fan boy... the issue with the budget was spending... not tax cuts.
So now what is your point about how much obama has spent compared to Reagan?
--
this was as of last year... it is now expected to be 20 trillion in debt. Obama has just about doubled a massive debt.
The total federal debt, which was $18,722,746,583,118.03 at the close of business on Monday, now equals about $159,007 per household.
It has increased approximately $68,756 per household during Obama’s presidency.
On Jan. 20, 2009, when Obama was inaugurated, the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08. On Nov. 23, 2015, it was $18,722,746,583,118.03 Thus, so far in Obama’s presidency, the federal debt has increased $8,095,869,534,204.95.
As of September, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were 117,748,000 households in the United States. The $18,722,746,583,118.03 in federal debt equals $159,006.91 for each one of those households.
The $8,095,869,534,204.95 that the debt has increased under Obama equals about 68,755.90 for each one of those households.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/debt-under-obama-8000000000000
You guys will be sorely disappointed. Trump is anything but that. Hillary prepared for this fight by shadow boxing her entire life......
correct... when the polls unskewed their samples and went with samples that were representative or previous presidential elections... the race was very close.
Then there was a storm and a big hug with a sell out... and 100% voting blocks in urban areas and a computer glitch in Romney ground game... and a moron who did not go after obama and crowly... when half the country was demanding him to show some backbone.
Then there was a storm and a big hug with a sell out... and 100% voting blocks in urban areas and a computer glitch in Romney ground game... and a moron who did not go after obama and crowly... when half the country was demanding him to show some backbone.
if you knew revenues when up... why are bring up tax cuts as a problem? there is no data for you to say that the cuts caused a loss of revenue. its possible they caused an increase. a few models are at best speculative... and most are biased bullshit there is no way you can say tax cuts caused a revenue short fall based on real world data.
that does not answer the question... revenues went up... given our best tools you still can't blame tax cuts without data showing tax cuts caused revenues to go down.
2. How much of the increased spending are you blaming on Reagan vs Congress and why. And do you attribute deficits an spending to democrats in the same manner?
2. How much of the increased spending are you blaming on Reagan vs Congress and why. And do you attribute deficits an spending to democrats in the same manner?