Clinton Emails show Soros gives her marching orders

[jem]

Open society is Nuspeak for society open to control by a crony run world govt.
so he worked to keep eastern block out of Russian or totalitarian control and works to keep the US out of the people's control.

There was no need for Futurecurrents to elaborate. You made the compelling argument yourself. Read the document you posted. Soros is a hero to all those who oppose totalitarian governments and support freedom of speech.

 

[piezoe]

In every society there is a small percent of crackpots. A typical conversation with them might proceed thus: You: "Hello Bill , how is your day going?"; Crackpot: "I saw a rabbit in the woods today. Shoehorn!"

You just smile, wave, and move on. What more can you do, other than to see that they are well cared for and safe?

 

[piezoe]

He does not support all freedom of speech. He only supports freedom of speech that he agrees with.

Actually, that's incorrect. He is a strong advocate for freedom of speech regardless of whether he agrees with it or not. Again, read what you posted.

 

[Tom B]

Actually, that's incorrect. He is a strong advocate for freedom of speech regardless of whether he agrees with it or not. Again, read what you posted.

No it is correct.

An internal proposed strategy from George Soros’s Open Society Justice Initiative calls for international regulation of private actors’ decisions on “what information is taken off the Internet and what may remain.” Those regulations, the document notes, should favor “those most supportive of open society.”

 

[Frederick Foresight]

No it is correct.

An internal proposed strategy from George Soros’s Open Society Justice Initiative calls for international regulation of private actors’ decisions on “what information is taken off the Internet and what may remain.” Those regulations, the document notes, should favor “those most supportive of open society.”

Evidently, comprehension can be an elusive thing for you. What you just wrote means that he doesn't want dictators oppressing free speech. Don't believe me? Then read this paragraph from your earlier post:

“But it is also presenting underaddressed challenges, including lack of regulation of private operators that are able to decide, without due process procedures, what information is taken off the Internet and what may remain. A ‘race to the bottom’ results from the agendas of undemocratic governments that seek to impose their hostility to free speech on the general online environment. We seek to ensure that, from among the norms emerging in different parts of the world, those most supportive of open society gain sway.”

It would appear that your blinding hate is destabilizing your cognition.

 

[piezoe]

No it is correct.

An internal proposed strategy from George Soros’s Open Society Justice Initiative calls for international regulation of private actors’ decisions on “what information is taken off the Internet and what may remain.” Those regulations, the document notes, should favor “those most supportive of open society.”

The Open Society foundation was objecting to selective deletion from the net in order to favor one side or the other. You'll have to look at the specific regulations being referred to as "those regulations" to understand this. As a help in comprehending please see the italics phrase in F.F's post immediately above. It is easy to get the wrong impression when words are taken out of context.

If you delve into the groups that the Open Society Foundation has funded , you will find a number of cases where the Foundation did not interfere, despite funds not being used in the way they had hoped. They give money and then are hands off. Very, very unusual.

 

[achilles28]

George Soros is public enemy#1 now. He's got a big cross hairs painted on his back. What a stupid fuck.

 

[smallStops]

George Soros is public enemy#1 now. He's got a big cross hairs painted on his back. What a stupid fuck.

Some of your thoughts are good in highlighting how some Americans think.
But why on earth go and call for murder? I don't know but every religion, every mind thing
put murder with something unhealthy in people. Never heard of healthy minded "murderer-incitator".
If Soros, with his billions decided to put a team on you, wouldn't you shout that it is not right?
If so, why call on his murder rather than putting the facts there for us to check these, reflect and make up our own mind?

 

[achilles28]

Some of your thoughts are good in highlighting how some Americans think.
But why on earth go and call for murder? I don't know but every religion, every mind thing
put murder with something unhealthy in people. Never heard of healthy minded "murderer-incitator".
If Soros, with his billions decided to put a team on you, wouldn't you shout that it is not right?
If so, why call on his murder rather than putting the facts there for us to check these, reflect and make up our own mind?

Who called for murder? This is the second time your broken English has made you look foolish. I would advise you to go back to school, enroll in an English degree, study and complete it, so you can comprehended what other native English speakers write or speak.

You want to talk murder? George Soros openly promoted the Mass Muslim Migration into Europe which has seen THOUSANDS of Europeans murdered, raped, children molested and assaulted. George Soros funded the revolution in Ukraine which has resulted in HUNDREDS DEAD. George Soros collaborated with the Nazis to sell out his own people.

When people out themselves as Traitors and extremist conspirers plotting to overthrow democratically elected Governments, the Law of the Universe paints a big crosshairs on their backs. And so to all the victims of their carnage. Do you understand?

 

[smallStops]

I will take your advice and enrol to improve my English. Thank you.
I was thinking of picking up another foreign language, but actually you are right: my English need improving.

So you never called for Soros murder?
Should we go over all your postings that are incitement to commit murder?

You live in a Western country: so go and put a legal complaint.
In France, Syrians have been putting legal complaints against one former Minister ( Fabius) for creating a war in their country. The case was thrown out of court, but the interest got the guy sacked from his job. These were people with nothing who gathered their own funds to get their voice heard. And now they are continuing their legal procedures against this same Minister. People suspect that it was thrown out of court so as to protect other politicians and others involved.

The British have started work on Tony Blair for the wars he created:
when are you, Americans, going to start taking legal actions regarding the wars YOUR country created in the Middle-East, sending all these people to Western countries ( and actually other countries not reported than Western one have also troubles with the same issues) with the consequences we all know of.
Surely, if the British have managed to believe that Tony Blair (Labout , left) was accountable, surely
your own politicians ( such as Bush or Rumsfeld, and al) have may be something to answer for ?

Now, why don't you address the core of the matter : holding your politicians who created this world wide mess to account for what they've done????