Clinton Emails show Soros gives her marching orders

Spike Trader said:
Hillary Clinton campaign just caught House Republicans leaking classified information

After a year-plus effort on the part of Republican leaders in the House of Representatives to tell the American public on the false claim that Hillary Clinton somehow leaked classified information via her emails, the entire faux-controversy may have just become very real. But as it turns out, it’s the House Republicans who appears to have just leaked classified information themselves in an overzealous attempt to paint Hillary. In fact the Clinton campaign is calling them out on it directly tonight.


After the Director of the FBI fully exonerated Hillary Clinton and made clear that she broke no laws and told no lies, House Republicans took the extraordinary step of demanding copies if the FBI’s notes from its interview with Clinton. That request was granted, and almost immediately, information from those notes began leaking to the media. The trouble: every word of those notes is, by definition, classified information.

Jennifer Palmieri, the Communications Director for the Hillary Clinton campaign, tweeted this evening that she “Would remind all that this material is classified. So this is leaking of classified material.” Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta added that he’s “Already hearing from people who have been contacted by reporters with knowledge of the content of their interviews in FBI 302’s.”

Palmieri went on to point out that not only are House Republicans leaking classified information, they’re likely releasing bits and pieces of it out of context in the hope of painting a different picture of Hillary Clinton’s testimony than what actually transpired. So not only is Paul Ryan’s crew committing imprisonable felonies as we speak, they may be doing it in an intentionally dishonest manner on top of it.


As a reminder, the FBI confirmed once and for all that Hillary Clinton never leaked classified information of any kind, told no lies, and broke no laws. It turns out the only ones breaking laws by leaking classified information are the Republicans trying to take her down.
More...
That article is a lie. Hillary clearly lied about emails. FBI never made a statement that she "told no lies".
 
piezoe said:
He was NOT rich as a child and neither was his family. A thirteen year old kid does not feel remorse for something he may barely understand and has no part of. Where do you guys come up with this nonsense. Oh, Glen Beck. Now there's a reliable source!
More...
A thirteen year old who was not a sociopath would feel remorse.
 
piezoe said:
He was NOT rich as a child and neither was his family. A thirteen year old kid does not feel remorse for something he may barely understand and has no part of. Where do you guys come up with this nonsense. Oh, Glen Beck. Now there's a reliable source!
More...
Where's the apology? Two days ago you called us fools and assholes for even hinting Soros worked for the Nazi's. Now that you've been shown the error of your ways, wheres our apology for insulting our integrity?
 
piezoe said:
He was NOT rich as a child and neither was his family. A thirteen year old kid does not feel remorse for something he may barely understand and has no part of. Where do you guys come up with this nonsense. Oh, Glen Beck. Now there's a reliable source!
More...

His father was a rich lawyer who had enough money to flee the country but for some reason left his son there, but he was rich enough to bribe a government official to take him in.

He was cognizant enough to know that he had to hide being jewish, as other jews were carted off. He either watched or helped in confiscating the property of other jews.

Any normal person would carry deep scars from this episode. He described it as the happiest period of his life. A normal person as an adult would at least be self-aware enough not to gloat over it, and however he actually felt, to describe it as deeply troubling. Not Soros. Just like with Hillary, the normal rules do not apply to him.
 
achilles28 said:
Where's the apology? Two days ago you called us fools and assholes for even hinting Soros worked for the Nazi's. Now that you've been shown the error of your ways, wheres our apology for insulting our integrity?
More...

Careful Achilles, you may trigger a 1,000 word rambling rant from Piezoe...
 
piezoe said:
philosophy, open society is based on the recognition that we all act on the basis of imperfect understanding. Nobody is in possession of the ultimate truth. Therefore, we need a critical mode of thinking; we need institutions and interests to live together in peace;​
See: "Soros on Soros," with Byron Wien and Krisztina Koenen, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Pgs. 112-113, 1995.
More...

I find this part of what he said very interesting and here's why. For a start society doesn't need a critical mode of thinking this is obfuscation in fact if a society was based in truth and morality definitively which is easily available to everybody it would then lead to a more free society and peace.
 
Last edited:
AAAintheBeltway said:
His father was a rich lawyer who had enough money to flee the country but for some reason left his son there, but he was rich enough to bribe a government official to take him in.

He was cognizant enough to know that he had to hide being jewish, as other jews were carted off. He either watched or helped in confiscating the property of other jews.

Any normal person would carry deep scars from this episode. He described it as the happiest period of his life. A normal person as an adult would at least be self-aware enough not to gloat over it, and however he actually felt, to describe it as deeply troubling. Not Soros. Just like with Hillary, the normal rules do not apply to him.
More...

Well said. Extremely odd and disturbing soros equated the happiest time of his life with working for the nazis. Also disturbing he relished in the pure power of it. Very telling. He's a scumbag
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
His father was a rich lawyer who had enough money to flee the country but for some reason left his son there, but he was rich enough to bribe a government official to take him in.

He was cognizant enough to know that he had to hide being jewish, as other jews were carted off. He either watched or helped in confiscating the property of other jews.

Any normal person would carry deep scars from this episode. He described it as the happiest period of his life. A normal person as an adult would at least be self-aware enough not to gloat over it, and however he actually felt, to describe it as deeply troubling. Not Soros. Just like with Hillary, the normal rules do not apply to him.
More...
His family had acquired some property that they eventually sold before the Nazis confuscated Jewish property, but they were middle class, not rich. His father who was an escaped prisoner of war in the First World war was a lawyer but was not very interested in practicing law. Soros' engineer brother was the one who acquired significant wealth before Soros acquired substantial capital on his own.
 
Piptaker said:
,,, in fact if a society was based in truth and morality definitively which is easily available to everybody it would then lead to a more free society and peace.
More...
Soros might agree with your observation, but possibly he might argue that you should omit the word "easily". Certainly the subjunctive mood is appropriate here.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top