We provided you with a list of of 200 peer reviewed scientific papers from the 1970s. Apparently you have seen fit to wallow in your own misguided fantasy instead of reality.
Climate Change
- Thread starter dbphoenix
- Start date
We provided you with a list of of 200 peer reviewed scientific papers from the 1970s. Apparently you have seen fit to wallow in your own misguided fantasy instead of reality.
The problem with idiots like GWB is that they read shit on right wing propaganda sites and uncritically accept it as true. For the same reason he also was sure tobacco was a healthy lifestyle until yesterday.
Again, 40 years ago.
The grown-up scientific mind is open to new data and re-thinking of hypotheses in order to formulate new hypotheses. This is why the Big Bang is a theory and the Law of Gravity is a law.
I guess we should have some pity. First of all these deniers are idiots, another is that they really have nothing other than this stupid crap.
A list of scientific papers are trash?
What is so amusing is that some of the authors of those scientific papers in the 1970s claiming the world was going to end due to global cooling are the same ones now pushing that global warming is going to end the world.
Tell us how that worked out for all the Alchemy advocates who kept refining their hypotheses about turning base metals into gold.
If the original science is a fantasy (like AGW) - new data and re-thinking simply leads to more junk science.
I never claiming that tobacco was a healthy lifestyle.
Certainly your AGW crack smoking is not a healthy lifestyle.
I much are you paid by the Skeptical Science "Crusher Crew" to spew this nonsense in the ET forums? Is it enough to cover your drug habit?
That would be characteristic of the right-wing anti-science mindset.
To suggest that scientific thought cannot change over a 40-year timespan betrays a misunderstanding of the nature of scientific enquiry.