Climate Change... its the sun... again.

[gwb-trading]

Well I want to make sure that real, important information doesn't get buried under the piles of image shit that you so stupidly post.

The only stupid images are your fabricated charts that you post over & over again. Some you have posted over 200 times. Is it time to remind you that the moderators told you to stop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Max E.]

The only stupid images are your fabricated charts that you post over & over again. Some you have posted over 200 times. Is it time to remind you that the moderators told you to stop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[futurecurrents]

The only stupid images are your fabricated charts that you post over & over again. Some you have posted over 200 times. Is it time to remind you that the moderators told you to stop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course you don't recognize the difference between the shit you post and this chart which is the single best chart showing the truth of AGW. You are simply too stupid.

 

[gwb-trading]

Of course you don't recognize the difference between the shit you post and this chart which is the single best chart showing the truth of AGW. You are simply too stupid.

The same nonsense over and over and over again...

You are starting to sound like a

 

[Ricter]

you gave us links to observations of warming...
you did not give any links to science showing man made co2 is causing it.

please don't start misrepresenting things like stu and fc you have shown integrity.

The science is a series of premises and a conclusion. It's all been laid out very clearly. The statement of the conclusion IS ITSELF science "showing" manmade CO2 very likely causing this warming. Show me the science that smoking causes lung cancer, and then I'll know what you consider a scientific "showing".


By the way, before I forget, there is one answer to that koan, from tradition, that is considered right:

What stopped the tail?

You did.

: )

 

[heypa]

Future Currents is a one trick pony.ie. Is co2 a green house gas? My question is "Are green house gases selective in their reflection direction?" If so how?
We know that the earth has been cooling for a helluva long time. Only lately has man been significantly been able to change the earths surface. To what extent does this affect "climate change.? In my opinion y'all are talking to a wall.

 

[jem]

that is not science showing man man co2 causes warming.

that is a conclusion based upon observation... unproven theory at best.
a theory that has been put to the test in models.
models which predicted warming these last 19 years even though there has been not warming...

hence the theory has failed. the warming is not solely caused by co2.
so now they are coming up with new theories which include the the sun and the tides.

The science is a series of premises and a conclusion. It's all been laid out very clearly. The statement of the conclusion IS ITSELF science "showing" manmade CO2 very likely causing this warming. Show me the science that smoking causes lung cancer, and then I'll know what you consider a scientific "showing".


By the way, before I forget, there is one answer to that koan, from tradition, that is considered right:

What stopped the tail?

You did.

: )

 

[Ricter]

that is not science showing man man co2 causes warming.

that is a conclusion based upon observation... theory at best.

Show me the science that smoking causes lung cancer, and then I'll know what you consider a scientific "showing".

 

[jem]

here we at least find some links to peer reviewed papers...


http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/can...e/tobacco-smoking-and-cancer-the-evidence#Ref 1

Chemicals in tobacco smoke can damage the body in many ways
Chemicals found in tobacco smoke can damage DNA 1, 11, 37. For example, studies have shown that benzo(a)pyrene damages a gene called p53 that normally protects our cells from cancer 37, 38. While polonium-210 becomes concentrated in hotspots in smokers’ airways, subjecting them to very high doses of high-energy alpha-radiation that damages the DNA of nearby cells 39.

The cocktail of chemicals in tobacco smoke is even more dangerous as a mix. Toxic metals found in tobacco smoke, like cadmium, arsenic, and lead, stop our cells from repairing DNA damage 40. This worsens the effects of chemicals like benzo(a)pyrene that damage DNA and makes it even more likely that damaged cells will eventually turn cancerous.

Many tobacco poisons disable the cleaning system that our bodies use to remove toxins. Some substances including formaldehyde and acrolein kill cilia, tiny hairs in our airways that help to clear away toxins 37.


--

I have been asking you for links to peer reviewed papers. (or nasa experiments)
you have not been able to produce any... or any science for that.

 

[Ricter]

here we at least find some links to peer reviewed papers...


http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/can...e/tobacco-smoking-and-cancer-the-evidence#Ref 1

Chemicals in tobacco smoke can damage the body in many ways
Chemicals found in tobacco smoke can damage DNA 1, 11, 37. For example, studies have shown that benzo(a)pyrene damages a gene called p53 that normally protects our cells from cancer 37, 38. While polonium-210 becomes concentrated in hotspots in smokers’ airways, subjecting them to very high doses of high-energy alpha-radiation that damages the DNA of nearby cells 39.

The cocktail of chemicals in tobacco smoke is even more dangerous as a mix. Toxic metals found in tobacco smoke, like cadmium, arsenic, and lead, stop our cells from repairing DNA damage 40. This worsens the effects of chemicals like benzo(a)pyrene that damage DNA and makes it even more likely that damaged cells will eventually turn cancerous.

Many tobacco poisons disable the cleaning system that our bodies use to remove toxins. Some substances including formaldehyde and acrolein kill cilia, tiny hairs in our airways that help to clear away toxins 37.


--

I have been asking you for links to peer reviewed papers. (or nasa experiments)
you have not been able to produce any... or any science for that.

Lung cancer has been discovered in the remains of humans tens of thousands of years old, long before the invention of cigarettes, etc.. It's just natural variability, only one in six smokers develop lung cancer.