Climate Change... its the sun... again.

[futurecurrents]

Great example of your problem. You try to dumb down GW to a point where you can understand it. It is much more complicated than that. Maybe it is just to complex for you to understand.

So why do you think CO2 is not a GHG?

 

[futurecurrents]

There are limits to what you can teach a retarded parrot.

So you think that the planet is not warming. Interesting.

 

[gwb-trading]

So you think that the planet is not warming. Interesting.

The planet is not being warmed by mankind releasing CO2 into the air.

 

[futurecurrents]

The planet is not being warmed by mankind releasing CO2 into the air.

So, like WTD2, you think CO2 is not a GHG.

 

[gwb-trading]

So what's warming it?

You "RECONSTRUCTED" temperature chart is an absurd fallacy. The medieval warm period was obviously warmer than it was today - as shown by all the scientific evidence including tree rings, etc. Just take a look at the Vikings growing crops in Iceland during the time.

 

[futurecurrents]

The planet is not being warmed by mankind releasing CO2 into the air.

So, like WTD2, you think CO2 is not a GHG. Interesting.

 

[futurecurrents]

You "RECONSTRUCTED" temperature chart is an absurd fallacy. The medieval warm period was obviously warmer than it was today - as shown by all the scientific evidence including tree rings, etc. Just take a look at the Vikings growing crops in Iceland during the time.

Yeah OK. Take it up with the seven different teams, using different methods, that came up with the numbers.

 

[WeToddDid2]

So, like WTD2, you think CO2 is not a GHG. Interesting.

I did not state either way. Please post a quote from me if I am wrong.

 

[futurecurrents]

I did not state either way. Please post a quote from me if I am wrong.

So then you know that CO2 is GHG.

 

[gwb-trading]

I did not state either way. Please post a quote from me if I am wrong.

futurecurrents is living this AGW alarmist fantasy that everyone who is skeptical about global warming does not believe CO2 is not a GHG.

FC apparently can not differentiate this from the reality of what we are telling him.
1) GHG regulates air temperature - not only increases it.
2) The amount of CO2 added by mankind is so minimal compared to the overall CO2.
3) There is no evidence that AGW is causing significantly increased global temperatures, increased ocean temperatures, raised ocean levels, increased severe weather, polar melting, or any other damage to the earth.

AGW is not a threat to man's existence or our habitat; "climate change' is not something that we need to take urgent action on.