Newspapers also work well. All those papers that pile up on the driveway (and I don't even have a subscription to them - what's up with that??) make for good fires in the fire pit. I wonder if it's an added bonus that they're liberal rags?
Climate change is UN-led hoax to create 'new world order' – Australian PM's adviser
- Thread starter achilles28
- Start date
Newspapers also work well. All those papers that pile up on the driveway (and I don't even have a subscription to them - what's up with that??) make for good fires in the fire pit. I wonder if it's an added bonus that they're liberal rags?
If you weren't such a right wing dummy you would know that burning paper is carbon neutral since the trees originally got the carbon from the air.
If you want to do it right you need to burn fossil fuels. Start a barrel of oil on fire.
What about all the ink on the paper? And the plastic wrapping it comes in? Is that also neutral?
I would think that creates a nice pollution release.
But point noted. I'll go out and get some old tires tomorrow.
What about all the ink on the paper? And the plastic wrapping it comes in? Is that also neutral?
I would think that creates a nice pollution release.
But point noted. I'll go out and get some old tires tomorrow.
Now you're talking. Not saying very much as usual but...
Maybe it's because I can't get serious when there are 50 or so threads with the same topic discussing the same thing over and over again.
there are thousands....
we have quoted them here before... some of them work for NASA signed the letter and got Hansen thrown out.
and to be clear... they are not denying... they are saying the science is not in. as I am saying.
there is not science showing man made co2 causes net warming here on earth.
we have quoted them here before... some of them work for NASA signed the letter and got Hansen thrown out.
and to be clear... they are not denying... they are saying the science is not in. as I am saying.
there is not science showing man made co2 causes net warming here on earth.
No there are certainly not thousands of climate scientists that deny AGW. You are just bald faced lying now. Come on jerm, you know being a lawyer means to lie without seeming like you are. Every prominent climate scientist in the world jerm. Every one is certain that AGW is true.
Again, jerm, you want us to think that AGW does not exist. Show us ONE climate scientist that denies it. One, you hypocrite "Christian".
Alternately, you can prove that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.
My guess is the key/ultimate question and focus relatively is not whether but How Much resources we should spend/allocate on improving the current trend of unfavourable climate change that could reach possibly to an irreversible stage in the future!
Some other relevant arguments would be comparatively minor, considering All existing spending on so many many aspects would be ultimately aimed for the wellbeing and advancement of human lives! Spiritually, mentally, physically, emotionally, intellectually, culturally, environmentally, morally, medically, ethically, economically, technologically, ... !!!
Some other relevant arguments would be comparatively minor, considering All existing spending on so many many aspects would be ultimately aimed for the wellbeing and advancement of human lives! Spiritually, mentally, physically, emotionally, intellectually, culturally, environmentally, morally, medically, ethically, economically, technologically, ... !!!
Last edited:
^ The earths climate has been in constant radical flux since it's creation.....long before humans came around. And long before humans burned fossil fuels as energy.
In fact, global C02 levels have been much, much higher in the recent and distant past, despite humans not even having evolved from branch-swinging apes. Even during that period of high CO2, the earth has experienced several radical shifts in temperature; both much hotter, and much cooler. Yes, the earth has experienced several ice ages during periods with much higher CO2.
Climatologists can't predict the weather 3 days in advance, with relative accuracy. Yet were supposed to entrust this ship of fools they can predict the weather 100 years...Nay! 300 years in advance with absolute pinpoint accuracy!! AND THEN let these prognosticating Charlatans dictate how many Trillions we spend (and how many millions we starve) to save the world from a shot-in-the-dark hunch, that 'something is happening'. This is patently ludicrous.
The other factor is that big ball in the sky called the sun. That thing ancient civilizations deified and worshipped as the giver of life, because in all metaphysical senses, it is. You see, the earth gets much hotter during the day, and much cooler at night. This corresponds to the big ball in the sky shining on one side of the earth; and conversely, NOT shining on the other side. And the sun doesn't shine with consistent intensity. It's always changing, in cycles. Sometimes the cycles are predictable, sometimes they're not. Sometimes the sun burns brighter, and the earth gets hotter. And sometimes the sun burns cooler, and the earth, also cools. Interesting, isn't it?
Look at the NASA solar system data. As the earth has cooled, and the ice caps expanded, all the other planets in the solar system have notably cooled as well. And their icecaps have expanded as well. Astonishingly, as the earths icecaps have melted and the earth warmed, all the ice caps on the other planets in the solar system have shrank too, as their planets warmed as well. What could be causing this amazing 'green-house gas' phenomenon on all the planets at the same time!?!??? The Sun, you fucking morons. The Sun.
And by the way, we want a warmer climate with higher CO2. More CO2 means more atmospheric O2. All animal life becomes much more animated and vibrant with higher levels of 02. Further, if the climate were to cool considerably, which is what you jack-ass morons purpose we do by killing the taxpayer and the industrial economy by redirecting trillions in resources to scorch the earth, mass tracts of arable land would become unproductive, and people would die off in masses. THink a new mini-ice age. Something the brilliant climatologists predicted back in the 70's. Now it's warming. Nope, now it's cooling. Well, lets just split the difference and call it "climate change" because we can't make up our minds, faster then we can fudge the data.
It's all a con game, you fools. The Right uses the specter of foreign enemies like the Russians, and the Viet Cong, and Saddam and Terrorists to scare their agenda through. The Left uses idiotic faux crisis like Global Warming and overpopulation and 'racism' to pass their agenda through. It's the same strategy - crisis-based politics. AKA the politics of FEAR. Are we learning yet, you stupid fucks????
The UN is another progenitor of the global crisis problem. When every problem is a 'global crisis', it not only justifies the UN's existence, but demands a GLOBAL AUTHORITY to deal and solve all of our oh so pressing problems, that will surely kill us all. Because, after all, as history has shown, humans can't last more then 100 years without a Global Government to save them. Well, lets just say 1000 years. Okay, lets just say we've never had a global government, but that's not the point.....The point is that we're all going to die NOW SO GIVE US ALL YOUR MONEY AND LET US DO WHATEVER THE FUCK WE NEED TO DO TO SAVE YOUR ASS, OKAY?!?!?!?
The problem is that you idiots on the Left are so fucking stupid, you don't have the mental sophistication to cut through the bullshit you've been fed. Just like the Right is so fucking braindead they gave up all their liberties happily to Bush so the Government could keep them safe from rag-heads in caves, despite the border being wide fucking open. We're just a nation of fools now, and you're squarely one of them.
In fact, global C02 levels have been much, much higher in the recent and distant past, despite humans not even having evolved from branch-swinging apes. Even during that period of high CO2, the earth has experienced several radical shifts in temperature; both much hotter, and much cooler. Yes, the earth has experienced several ice ages during periods with much higher CO2.
Climatologists can't predict the weather 3 days in advance, with relative accuracy. Yet were supposed to entrust this ship of fools they can predict the weather 100 years...Nay! 300 years in advance with absolute pinpoint accuracy!! AND THEN let these prognosticating Charlatans dictate how many Trillions we spend (and how many millions we starve) to save the world from a shot-in-the-dark hunch, that 'something is happening'. This is patently ludicrous.
The other factor is that big ball in the sky called the sun. That thing ancient civilizations deified and worshipped as the giver of life, because in all metaphysical senses, it is. You see, the earth gets much hotter during the day, and much cooler at night. This corresponds to the big ball in the sky shining on one side of the earth; and conversely, NOT shining on the other side. And the sun doesn't shine with consistent intensity. It's always changing, in cycles. Sometimes the cycles are predictable, sometimes they're not. Sometimes the sun burns brighter, and the earth gets hotter. And sometimes the sun burns cooler, and the earth, also cools. Interesting, isn't it?
Look at the NASA solar system data. As the earth has cooled, and the ice caps expanded, all the other planets in the solar system have notably cooled as well. And their icecaps have expanded as well. Astonishingly, as the earths icecaps have melted and the earth warmed, all the ice caps on the other planets in the solar system have shrank too, as their planets warmed as well. What could be causing this amazing 'green-house gas' phenomenon on all the planets at the same time!?!??? The Sun, you fucking morons. The Sun.
And by the way, we want a warmer climate with higher CO2. More CO2 means more atmospheric O2. All animal life becomes much more animated and vibrant with higher levels of 02. Further, if the climate were to cool considerably, which is what you jack-ass morons purpose we do by killing the taxpayer and the industrial economy by redirecting trillions in resources to scorch the earth, mass tracts of arable land would become unproductive, and people would die off in masses. THink a new mini-ice age. Something the brilliant climatologists predicted back in the 70's. Now it's warming. Nope, now it's cooling. Well, lets just split the difference and call it "climate change" because we can't make up our minds, faster then we can fudge the data.
It's all a con game, you fools. The Right uses the specter of foreign enemies like the Russians, and the Viet Cong, and Saddam and Terrorists to scare their agenda through. The Left uses idiotic faux crisis like Global Warming and overpopulation and 'racism' to pass their agenda through. It's the same strategy - crisis-based politics. AKA the politics of FEAR. Are we learning yet, you stupid fucks????
The UN is another progenitor of the global crisis problem. When every problem is a 'global crisis', it not only justifies the UN's existence, but demands a GLOBAL AUTHORITY to deal and solve all of our oh so pressing problems, that will surely kill us all. Because, after all, as history has shown, humans can't last more then 100 years without a Global Government to save them. Well, lets just say 1000 years. Okay, lets just say we've never had a global government, but that's not the point.....The point is that we're all going to die NOW SO GIVE US ALL YOUR MONEY AND LET US DO WHATEVER THE FUCK WE NEED TO DO TO SAVE YOUR ASS, OKAY?!?!?!?
The problem is that you idiots on the Left are so fucking stupid, you don't have the mental sophistication to cut through the bullshit you've been fed. Just like the Right is so fucking braindead they gave up all their liberties happily to Bush so the Government could keep them safe from rag-heads in caves, despite the border being wide fucking open. We're just a nation of fools now, and you're squarely one of them.
Last edited:
^ Thee is so much wrong with you wrote that I don't know where to begin. So I offer these three relevant charts instead.
http://www.revisescience.co.uk/2011/images/1000yr_change.jpg
http://www.revisescience.co.uk/2011/images/1000yr_change.jpg