Climate change is UN-led hoax to create 'new world order' – Australian PM's adviser

[futurecurrents]

should be easy to point to some papers which show man made co2 causes warming.
Yet you never have... the best you do is point to a few articles which speak of models and theories... all of which are debunked by current science which show levels trail warming and cooling and temps are impacted by the sun and tides.

not that a "consensus" matters in science...
but there are over 30,000 scientists who question the idea of man made co2 causing significant warming.

So you can't come up with ONE? Amazing. Yet you say that there is no consensus. You can't even come up with ONE reputable climate expert that denies global warming. I am not surprised at that at all.

Jem, you are a troll and a crazed liar. In addition, you are an immoral hypocrite by denying the deadly truth of AGW. You are no real Christian. You are just into it for personal salvation. A selfish reason.

 

[WeToddDid2]

So you can't come up with ONE? Amazing. Yet you say that there is no consensus. You can't even come up with ONE reputable climate expert that denies global warming. I am not surprised at that at all.

Jem, you are a troll and a crazed liar. In addition, you are an immoral hypocrite by denying the deadly truth of AGW. You are no real Christian. You are just into it for personal salvation. A selfish reason.

The issue is that your definition of "reputable climate expert" is that they believe in global warming or they are not reputable. If a reputable climate expert disagrees with global warming doctrine, political factions and special interest groups that are funding by the global elite run a character assassination campaign to put that expert outside of your definition of reputable.

I find it extremely ironic and funny that the very same 1%ers that you hate so much are the very same people pushing the global warming scam. The irony is that you are working on the rich 1%ers behalf disseminating their propaganda.

 

[jem]

I believe in conserving the environment, you fricken greenhouse gas salesman. In the past I devoted time to clean ocean and bay causes.

Get off your high horse... and stop selling greenhouse gases for a living. Then... actually produce some science you fricken troll. How dare you think leftist / commie bastards have the moral high ground on this or any other issue.

Co2 is plant food. With the increasing population... we would rather be warmer than cooler.
If we knew man made co2 was hurting the planet... I would be all for reasonable limits.

But we have no science... if you did you would produce it. you never have produce one shred of evidence showing man made co2 is causing warming in our environment. Is it possible... yes. have you evidence... no.

So you can't come up with ONE? Amazing. Yet you say that there is no consensus. You can't even come up with ONE reputable climate expert that denies global warming. I am not surprised at that at all.

Jem, you are a troll and a crazed liar. In addition, you are an immoral hypocrite by denying the deadly truth of AGW. You are no real Christian. You are just into it for personal salvation. A selfish reason.

 

[futurecurrents]

I believe in conserving the environment, you fricken greenhouse gas salesman. In the past I devoted time to clean ocean and bay causes.

Get off your high horse... and stop selling greenhouse gases for a living. Then... actually produce some science you fricken troll. How dare you think leftist / commie bastards have the moral high ground on this or any other issue.

Co2 is plant food. With the increasing population... we would rather be warmer than cooler.
If we knew man made co2 was hurting the planet... I would be all for reasonable limits.

But we have no science... if you did you would produce it. you never have produce one shred of evidence showing man made co2 is causing warming in our environment. Is it possible... yes. have you evidence... no.

Not even one? And we are to believe your nonsense that there is no consensus.

You are a hypocrite "Christian" and a liar. You would let future children die from AGW rather than address the problem. You and your kind are truly evil.

 

[jem]

you are one sick drone sob.
you sell greenhouse gases for a living.


I believe in preserving the environment in useful ways and not wasting billions and putting our children in even greater debt and threat to their future freedoms.

Like I said you liar... if you produced evidence that man made co2 was warming... I would be in favor of reasonable limits.

Right now you are just working to destroy our kids freedoms and futures by being a troll/drone for the pre commie left.
And in case your forgot the commies are not good from freedoms, religious, economics or otherwise and they destroy the environment.... you drone fool.

 

[futurecurrents]

you are one sick drone sob.
you sell greenhouse gases for a living.


I believe in preserving the environment in useful ways and not wasting billions and putting our children in even greater debt and threat to their future freedoms.

Like I said you liar... if you produced evidence that man made co2 was warming... I would be in favor of reasonable limits.

Right now you are just working to destroy our kids freedoms and futures by being a troll/drone for the pre commie left.
And in case your forgot the commies are not good from freedoms, religious, economics or otherwise and they destroy the environment.... you drone fool.

Look, it's simple jerm. AGW will result in large scale death and destruction especially if we don't do anything about it as you would have us not do. Thus your position is immoral. Particularly because you are being intellectually dishonest.

You are no Christian. Altruism is key to Christianity. You are just doing the Church for feel-good selfish reasons. You are a hypocrite.

 

[jem]

1. co2 is plant food you pagan fool. There is no reason to think warming is worse than cooling... or even staying stable if we could. historically we are at very low co2 levels.

2. you have not even established the fact that the increase in co2 is man made and not because by the oceans warming based on natural causes.

3. and don't give me that emissions have gone up crap... there is no reason to assume we are in a closed system.

4. and you have not even shown we have warmed outside of natural variation.

 

[futurecurrents]

1. co2 is plant food you pagan fool. There is no reason to think warming is worse than cooling... or even staying stable if we could. historically we are at very low co2 levels.

2. you have not even established the fact that the increase in co2 is man made and not because by the oceans warming based on natural causes.

3. and don't give me that emissions have gone up crap... there is no reason to assume we are in a closed system.

4. and you have not even shown we have warmed outside of natural variation.

How much of the greenhouse effect is CO2 responsible for? How many degrees warmer is the earth because of it?

Because really, unless you can prove that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, your "argument" is ludicrous.

Simple question jem. What does the science say. As far as your religion crazed delusional intellect can tell.

BTW...numbers 1-4 above?with the possible exception of "CO2 is plant food" You are wrong on each one. Laughably so. Like holy shit I can't believe someone could be that stupid and wrong.

Anyone can do a Google search and see how wrong you are.

 

[Fractals 'R Us]

I remember when California passed it's first major pro-queer law. Since then Aerospace left, Los Angeles transformed into Tijuana and they have a drought that won't quit. The future might not be that great if their drought causes enough communities' water supplies to dry up: they will become unlivable, tax revenues will drop and all the overextended public sector thingies will be broke... Outside of that I guess God is fine with all the atheist lefts' policies LOL

 

[gwb-trading]

How much of the greenhouse effect is CO2 responsible for? How many degrees warmer is the earth because of it?

Because really, unless you can prove that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, your "argument" is ludicrous.

Simple question jem. What does the science say. As far as your religion crazed delusional intellect can tell.

BTW...numbers 1-4 above?with the possible exception of "CO2 is plant food" You are wrong on each one. Laughably so. Like holy shit I can't believe someone could be that stupid and wrong.

Anyone can do a Google search and see how wrong you are.

Wow.... An AGW religious extremist calling someone else a crazed delusional religious extremist.