Climate change is UN-led hoax to create 'new world order' – Australian PM's adviser

I just read the quote...the guys says there very likely could be a drought component to God's judgment.

Is that the best you could do considering there are 29,000 results in google for cause of california drought. There must be some comment somewhere... right?

Born in California? why leave... not progressive enough?
(note the correct spelling of oraface above is orifice. The funny thing is I looked it up and still typed it incorrectly. )
 
The Australian prime minister's chief business adviser says that climate change is a ruse led by the United Nations to create a new world order under the agency's control. The statement coincided with a visit from the UN's top climate negotiator.

Maurice Newman, chairman of Prime Minister Tony Abbott's business advisory council, said the UN is using false models which show sustained temperature increases because it wants to end democracy and impose authoritarian rule.

"It's a well-kept secret, but 95 percent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error," he wrote in an opinion piece published in The Australian newspaper on Friday, without providing evidence.

"The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook,” he said, adding that the UN is against capitalism and freedom and wants to create a “new world order.”

http://rt.com/news/256861-climate-change-un-hoax/


Oh, so he's a nut job.
 
some of us live here and say you are pulling that out of a dark orafice.

we really suspect its the sun and the tides... because that is once science suspects.


http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015...a-drought-caused-by-warm-ocean-anomalies.html

1930s Dust Bowl Drought – and Current California Drought – Caused By Warm Ocean Anomalies
Posted on May 6, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog
A scientific paper published last month in the journal Climate Dynamics by a scientist from NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center and three universities found that the 1930s drought was exacerbated by an anomalous warm spots in the ocean:

Unusually hot summer conditions occurred during the 1930s over the central United States and undoubtedly contributed to the severity of the Dust Bowl drought. We investigate local and large-scale conditions in association with the extraordinary heat and drought events, making use of novel datasets of observed climate extremes and climate reanalysis covering the past century. We show that the unprecedented summer heat during the Dust Bowl years was likely exacerbated by land-surface feedbacks associated with springtime precipitation deficits. The reanalysis results indicate that these deficits were associated with the coincidence of anomalously warm North Atlantic and Northeast Pacific surface waters and a shift in atmospheric pressure patterns leading to reduced flow of moist air into the central US. Thus, the combination of springtime ocean temperatures and atmospheric flow anomalies, leading to reduced precipitation, also holds potential for enhanced predictability of summer heat events. The results suggest that hot drought, more severe than experienced during the most recent 2011 and 2012 heat waves, is to be expected when ocean temperature anomalies like those observed in the 1930s occur in a world that has seen significant mean warming.

Similarly, a warm “blob” of ocean water is currently floating off the West coast of the U.S. And – as reported by the Washington Post, NBC News, and CBS – scientists say that the warm anomaly may be causing the California drought.

Postscript: Scientists say that the warm seawater anomalies are associated with shifts in atmospheric pressure patterns, which may – in turn – be caused by periodic fluctuations in the “Pacific decadal oscillation” or the “North Pacific mode“. And see this.

Interestingly, these patterns may, in turn, be effected by fluctuations in the output from the sun. For example, National Geographic reported in 2008:



The sun’s fluctuations can help predict extreme climatic events on Earth decades ahead of time, new research suggests.

***

The cycles, which are driven by the sun’s magnetic turbulence, may influence weather systems on Earth, particularly the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, a periodic climatic system associated with floods and droughts mostly in the Southern Hemisphere.

***

The Southern Oscillation Index, which measures the El Niño-Southern Oscillation system, seems to correspond with a 90-year sun cycle, Baker found.

***

Periods of greater solar disturbances are associated with rainy periods, whereas a calmer sun dovetailed with times of drought in Australia, Baker said.

***

El Niño and La Niña, which creates opposite climatic effects from El Niño, also affect North America.

That means long-range forecasting is possible for water availability in Mexico and the western United States, where droughts are often severe, Baker said.

How solar cycles may influence Earth’s weather systems is not well understood, but Baker speculated that cosmic radiation is a factor.

For instance, Baker’s research shows that periods of high cosmic radiation coincide with particularly long La Niñas, Baker said.



Nope, it's the 40% increase in CO2. And CO2 controls the earth's temeperature. Like a thermostat. Every science org and climate scientist in the world agree.
 
Nope, it's the 40% increase in CO2. And CO2 controls the earth's temeperature. Like a thermostat. Every science org and climate scientist in the world agree.
No, scientists don't agree. The 'overwhelming consensus' is another hoax. Just like the made up climate numbers.

And it's the sun that controls earths temperature, numbnuts. That's why it gets warm during the day and cold at night. Comprehende?
 
No, scientists don't agree. The 'overwhelming consensus' is another hoax. Just like the made up climate numbers.

And it's the sun that controls earths temperature, numbnuts. That's why it gets warm during the day and cold at night. Comprehende?


Nope. The consensus is over 97%. Every science org in the world. The Weather Channel. Exxon. etc. The debate over the basics is over.

Only complete morons deny AGW at this point.

CO2 levels has greater control of the temp of the earth than solar variation.
 
it was 97% of a select group of authors published in nutter journals who say man contributes... it did not say man man made co2 causes warming.

there were other studies which were totally debunked.

in real life the number is closer to 50/50.
 
it was 97% of a select group of authors published in nutter journals who say man contributes... it did not say man man made co2 causes warming.

there were other studies which were totally debunked.

in real life the number is closer to 50/50.


So it should be easy to find a single science organization that denies it. Let's see it. Or even one climate scientist, that publishes a decent amount within the field. Not a fraud like Salby.

Go for it jerm. We'll be waiting. LOL
 
should be easy to point to some papers which show man made co2 causes warming.
Yet you never have... the best you do is point to a few articles which speak of models and theories... all of which are debunked by current science which show levels trail warming and cooling and temps are impacted by the sun and tides.

not that a "consensus" matters in science...
but there are over 30,000 scientists who question the idea of man made co2 causing significant warming.
 
Back
Top