That seems like a balanced review of her. I like how it carries the same format as a wikipedia entry. Adds authenticity.
Climate change is UN-led hoax to create 'new world order' – Australian PM's adviser
- Thread starter achilles28
- Start date
That seems like a balanced review of her. I like how it carries the same format as a wikipedia entry. Adds authenticity.
SourceWatch - a website funded to attack scientists who deny "climate change" is balanced - I think not!
Sorry. I thought my post would be obvious sarcasm.
Which of the cited facts about Curry and her conduct don't appeal to you?
Last edited:
Obviously the entire write-up is an attack piece.
Obviously the entire write-up is an attack piece.
Judge temporarily halts fracking permits in North Carolina
http://www.wral.com/judge-temporarily-halts-fracking-permits-in-north-carolina/14657900/
http://www.wral.com/judge-temporarily-halts-fracking-permits-in-north-carolina/14657900/
Specifically, which alleged facts do you not believe to be actual facts about her conduct. The criticisms are fairly specific, so surely you can point to something specific.
The entire thing is a nonsense attack piece funded by the global warming cabal. When the first paragraph includes quotes like "She has further embarrassed herself (and her university) by using refuted denier talking points and defending the Wegman Report" - it is not necessary to go into the entire obscene write-up point by point.
When the the Source Watch write-up on Michael Mann includes how he fabricated data and embarrassed Penn State then maybe I will consider reading any summary on their website.
"...eventually admitting she hadn't even read it in the first place."
Any other specific complaints you'd like to share about the piece in question?
Last edited: