Climate Change Deemed Growing Security Threat by Military Researchers

So you never answered. Which right wing propaganda site did this come from?
It didn't come from any "right wing propaganda site" you delusional moron. It took me all of a few minutes to write.
5295f2e54cb1695af582e528db06c885.jpg


And is it possible that going forward climate change will be more important than a mostly neutered Al Qaeda? Let me answer for you. Yes.
And elves dancing around mushrooms by the light of the moon will burn a magical incense made of fruitloops and green lifesavers that will neutralize greenhouse gases if we all vote democrap and pay higher taxes.
 
The amusing part is that the Koch brothers are only the 59th biggest donors in American politics. Just the six biggest union donors in American politics combined give 15 times more money than the Koch brothers have – and, of course, that money went almost exclusively to Democrats. There are also at least 8 individual rich liberals who give more than the Koch brothers - but somehow the left wing seems to be focused on the Koch brothers as being the root of all evil -- while ignoring the mountain of money provided by liberal wealthy benefactors which perverts American politics.

http://www.rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/7-filthy-rich-liberals-railing-against-the-rich-in-quotes/

<img src="http://sunlightfoundation.com/media/2013/10/fig12.png">
 
< leading government-funded military research organization concluded. >

LOL. Our government wastes more $$$$ than you will ever know on military research. As was stated in another thread I experienced the waste for 2 years as a contractor. Yeah, yeah ... let's embrace their conclusions ... after all their motivation is to get yet MORE $$$$$ for future 'research'. Last, we have 2 neighbors .. both retired Navy, in early to mid 50's ... now contractors. They claim they are grossly overpaid for what they do. Yet they head out on boondoggles to Hawaii for 'conferences. etc.
%%%%%%%%%%%%
Funny, but accurate, hard hitting points.
You mean because many mid east nations are a hot desert climate;
you say that does NOT prove global warming scam???:D

I agree.
:cool:Even PBS radio accidently let the cat out of bag+ said should they call global warming ''climate change''.
 
"Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels on new Fed climate report: ‘I have read dozens of these compendia on climate change and this was the worst one I have ever read in my life.’ – ‘I was one of the reviewers on the report.’

Michaels on Obama climate report National Climate Assessment: 'I was one of the reviewers on the report. I have read dozens of these compendia on climate change and this was the worst one I have ever read in my life. It’s one sided, it ignores tremendous amounts of the scientific literature. It is a document designed to tell a story and to give the President an excuse for a policy that no one wants...It is a boneheaded report for a President that has a tin ear on this issue. The drum beat goes on and on and on.'"

from climatedepot.com
 
"Flashback: Hansen’s climate model says ice age to occur by 2021, ‘no need to worry about CO2′
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/05/flashback-hansens-climate-model-says.html
Flashback from the Washington Times, July 9, 1971, a NASA scientist using a “computer program developed by Dr. James Hansen” predicted an ice age would occur within 50-60 years. According to Hansen’s computer model, “they found no need to worry about the carbon dioxide fuel-burning puts in the atmosphere.”"

from climatedepot.com
 
"Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels on new Fed climate report: ‘I have read dozens of these compendia on climate change and this was the worst one I have ever read in my life.’ – ‘I was one of the reviewers on the report.’

Michaels on Obama climate report National Climate Assessment: 'I was one of the reviewers on the report. I have read dozens of these compendia on climate change and this was the worst one I have ever read in my life. It’s one sided, it ignores tremendous amounts of the scientific literature. It is a document designed to tell a story and to give the President an excuse for a policy that no one wants...It is a boneheaded report for a President that has a tin ear on this issue. The drum beat goes on and on and on.'"

from climatedepot.com

Patrick J. ("Pat") Michaels (born February 15, 1950) is an American climatologist. Michaels is a senior research fellow for Research and Economic Development at George Mason University,[1] and a senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute.

Funding from energy or fossil fuel companies

On July 27, 2006 ABC News reported that a Colorado energy cooperative, the Intermountain Rural Electric Association, had given Michaels $100,000.[37] An Associated Press report said that the donations had been made after Michaels had "told Western business leaders ... that he was running out of money for his analyses of other scientists' global warming research" and noted that the cooperative had a vested interest in opposing mandatory carbon dioxide caps, a situation that raised conflict of interest concerns.[38]
Patrick Michaels acknowledged on CNN that 40 per cent of his funding came from the oil industry.[39] According to Fred Pearce, fossil fuel companies have helped fund Michaels' projects, including his World Climate Report, published every year since 1994, and his "advocacy science consulting firm", New Hope Environmental Services.[40]
A 2005 article in the Seattle Times reported that Michaels had received more than $165,000 in fuel-industry funding, including money from the coal industry to publish his own climate journal.[7]


lol ..... you denialist nutters make such good sheep.
 
Patrick J. ("Pat") Michaels (born February 15, 1950) is an American climatologist. Michaels is a senior research fellow for Research and Economic Development at George Mason University,[1] and a senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute.

Funding from energy or fossil fuel companies

On July 27, 2006 ABC News reported that a Colorado energy cooperative, the Intermountain Rural Electric Association, had given Michaels $100,000.[37] An Associated Press report said that the donations had been made after Michaels had "told Western business leaders ... that he was running out of money for his analyses of other scientists' global warming research" and noted that the cooperative had a vested interest in opposing mandatory carbon dioxide caps, a situation that raised conflict of interest concerns.[38]
Patrick Michaels acknowledged on CNN that 40 per cent of his funding came from the oil industry.[39] According to Fred Pearce, fossil fuel companies have helped fund Michaels' projects, including his World Climate Report, published every year since 1994, and his "advocacy science consulting firm", New Hope Environmental Services.[40]
A 2005 article in the Seattle Times reported that Michaels had received more than $165,000 in fuel-industry funding, including money from the coal industry to publish his own climate journal.[7]


lol ..... you denialist nutters make such good sheep.


oh, i see, 165,00 yr makes his work less than partial.
but global warming swindlers getting billions every year from the taxpayer are clean.

lol,

do you really think you are taken seriously by anyone on this forum?
 
Patrick J. ("Pat") Michaels (born February 15, 1950) is an American climatologist. Michaels is a senior research fellow for Research and Economic Development at George Mason University,[1] and a senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute.

Funding from energy or fossil fuel companies

On July 27, 2006 ABC News reported that a Colorado energy cooperative, the Intermountain Rural Electric Association, had given Michaels $100,000.[37] An Associated Press report said that the donations had been made after Michaels had "told Western business leaders ... that he was running out of money for his analyses of other scientists' global warming research" and noted that the cooperative had a vested interest in opposing mandatory carbon dioxide caps, a situation that raised conflict of interest concerns.[38]
Patrick Michaels acknowledged on CNN that 40 per cent of his funding came from the oil industry.[39] According to Fred Pearce, fossil fuel companies have helped fund Michaels' projects, including his World Climate Report, published every year since 1994, and his "advocacy science consulting firm", New Hope Environmental Services.[40]
A 2005 article in the Seattle Times reported that Michaels had received more than $165,000 in fuel-industry funding, including money from the coal industry to publish his own climate journal.[7]


lol ..... you denialist nutters make such good sheep.

Lol, good find.
 
Back
Top