Climate Change 2 - its also the submarine volcanoes

[dbphoenix]

Interesting the way he changes the question after being caught in posting something stupid. It's a habit.

 

[jem]

db, your lack of comprehension is the only stupid thing here.

I asked a new question in response to Ricter's incorrect statement. the question was designed to illustrate the same point as the previous questions.

co2 does cause cooling or technically prevent warming. (also)

Interesting the way he changes the question after being caught in posting something stupid. It's a habit.

 

[loyek590]

why is it republicans think the climate is warming but man has little to do with it, but democrats think the climate is warming and man is the cause?

 

[jem]

good question.. especially since the only position one can take is that based on the lack of actual science on this subject ... we may or may not be warming outside of natural variability. and

Man made co2 may or not be contributing to the warming.

why is it republicans think the climate is warming but man has little to do with it, but democrats think the climate is warming and man is the cause?

 

[loyek590]

good question.. especially since the only position one can take is that based on the lack of actual science on this subject ... we may or may not be warming outside of natural variability. and

Man made co2 may or not be contributing to the warming.

yes, it is just a little curious, if all we are talking about is science, why one side all lines up on one side, and the other lines up on the other side.

makes me think there is something going on here more than science

 

[dbphoenix]

db, your lack of comprehension is the only stupid thing here.

I asked a new question in response to Ricter's incorrect statement. the question was designed to illustrate the same point as the previous questions.

co2 does cause cooling or technically prevent warming. (also)

You asked a new question. You did not, as you said, "repeat" the question.

Lazy thinking, as usual. Or no thinking. Whatever.

 

[Ricter]

so now I repeat is co2 transparent to the infrared part of sunlight?

No. It absorbs IR and becomes more energetic. CO2 is transparent to visible light, aka "sunshine".

 

[jem]

I can see you have refined your understanding, Ricter.

Thereby, you must now agree that CO2 does indeed block incoming IR and thereby prevent some warming.

So I hope you will not stop it with your no it does not schtick.

 

[jem]

it looks like a different question to uneducated trolls.
it was essentially the same question to those who understand the science.

You asked a new question. You did not, as you said, "repeat" the question.

Lazy thinking, as usual. Or no thinking. Whatever.

 

[dbphoenix]

it looks like a different question to uneducated trolls.
it was essentially the same question to those who understand the science.

Key word being "essentially", i.e., not the same.

Don't try that slick lawyerly folderol on me, sonny.