There are tons of links to articles and there are over 1000 peer reveiwed papers you can locate that disprove the AGW science. I suggest you read those threads and the competing science. You will find what you need if you are truly looking for the facts and the truth.Quote from sle:
Maybe I was not clear. Do you have any references from any peer reviewed publications that (a) denies increase of the mean temperatures and (b) proves an alternative hypothesis to human industrial/agricultural activity being a major contributor to this increase? Not investors.com nor forbes.com, but a real scientific journal.
PS. Yes, I have downloaded the data from GISS and it looks pretty convincing to me.
But a number are linked peer reviewed papers can be found here. http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
BTW, Hanson has a problem with slanted data and analysis. Here is just one mention of it.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/04/...emprical-evidence-rather-than-climate-models/