Climate Alarmists May Inherit the Wind
- Thread starter Poindexter
- Start date
Sorry, but your link to futurecurrents' website -- that prominently features a photo of your shit-stained underwear from a long day of trolling -- isn't a credible reference.
Since IBD editorials about climate fraud trigger you so much (and I'm such a nice person), here are a few more:
U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/
U.N. Official Admits Belief In Global Warming Is Religious
https://www.investors.com/politics/...rajendra-pachauri-resigns-from-united-nation/
Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
https://www.investors.com/politics/...mist-admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/
Global Warming: One More Official Exposes Real Goal Of Climate Scare
https://www.investors.com/politics/...-official-exposes-real-goal-of-climate-scare/
RIGHT-CENTER BIASThese media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Notes: Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) is an American media company covering international business, finance, economics and the stock market. IBD allows lobbyists and PR reps for right wing think tanks like the Heartland Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute to write pseudo-scientific propaganda. (6/14/2016) Updated (1/5/2017)
Source: http://www.investors.com/
Mixed..
Because finding all his sources on one site.. not "a credible reference".
Question! I sort of read back over your posts about the 22 and stuff as I was on my phone on Friday. Were you berating me for not knowing "R" in 22LR is rimfire and not Long Rifle?
Small calibers are always rimfire because well, it makes way more sense. I struggle to see your point unless you had rimfire and rifle confused in your great big old brain?
Forget the media. IPCC's reports alone will probably cause the climate alarmists to lose this case in court. Have you read them?RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Notes: Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) is an American media company covering international business, finance, economics and the stock market. IBD allows lobbyists and PR reps for right wing think tanks like the Heartland Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute to write pseudo-scientific propaganda. (6/14/2016) Updated (1/5/2017)
Source: http://www.investors.com/
Wrong. You still don't seem to grasp that .22 is small caliber and the .223 Remington, for example, is technically .22 caliber and centerfire.
A 'scientist' using editorials from 'investors.com' to display his scientific knowledge. The fact that you didn't address why the editorial is bullshit given it's based on conjecture by a paid shill who has no expertise on the subject and who has been laughably wrong in the past shows the kind of low intellect Con I expected you to be.
No wonder Trump University was such a success, a sucker born a minute.
Prove it's wrong, shit-for-brains. The simple fact that Heller triggers you alarmists so much means he's probably onto something. And it's not just Heller, troll.
You want to debate climate change with me? You're already what, 0 wins and 5 or 6 losses with me and you want to add another defeat?
The editorial you provided based it's anlaysis on Heller and what the fuck is there to prove wrong when doesn't prove the data and is afraid to get it peer reviewed.
Debate climate change with you? You didn't even know the basic details about USPS in the other thread, you worship a Trump university scammer, I'd rather watch tranny porn than debate science with morons like you.
You are funnin with me, like your climate change stuff.
So you fucked up and now you are doing a skunk spray of reversing what I actually said and something I never had a reason to say? And ignoring the video I posted explaining exactly this in reference to the gross miss-characterisation of the ammo normally used in the AR-15 by the large black man as being not military grade. You are a hoot.
22LR, 5.56 and .223 are all small caliber, the length and shape/mass bullet is different.
You brought rimfire into it because a cosmic ray made you think 22LR meant Long Rimfire and not Long Rifle?
Because you jumped the gun (pun intended) now you are just off on a diversionary tangent, not with me but to occlude your ignorance to others reading. Because you are embarrassed?
"How big is a 223 round?
Source(s): The .223 Remington (.223 Rem) is a rifle cartridge. It is commercially loaded with 0.224 inch (5.56 mm) diameter jacketed bullets, with weights ranging from 40 to 85 grains (2.6 to 5.8 g), though the most common loading by far is 55 grains (3.6 g)."
It seemed that the large black man figured it was the one on the left that an AR-15 usually fires. It can, with a 22LR mod kit (I never saw one but internet says they are made). This is 22 caliber, Long Rifle and also rimfire (not much space otherwise).
So now you understand 'caliber' and also that the R in LR is not Rimfire.
If you confuse things like this with something as simple as guns, you might want to give climate change a wide berth.
Last edited:
So you have nothing to prove the editorial wrong and are afraid to debate "climate change" with me. Got it.