So the 'scientist' is quoting an editorial by 'Investors' which is published in the 'politics' section.
And the editorial is based on Tony Heller's 'analysis' who has no qualifications and is a paid shill, a bad shill who didn't know the difference between sea ice and a glacier.
https://tonyhellerakastevengoddard.com/who-is-tony-heller/
Thanks for exposing the kind of scientist you are Con.
Good call. Yet so easy for anyone with some basic research to find out that it is complete industry propaganda bullshit, but somehow he does not.
It's clear that he is either very stupid, or a liar of the highest lowest? caliber. Speaking of guns.