Climate Alarmists May Inherit the Wind

jem said:
I have to repeat the phrase accurately because your team always tries to play gotcha instead of providing science.


I could say there is no peer reviewed science which says that man made co2 causes warming.
As the founder of green peace says...

But then you will pull out garbage papers which claim that models can be trusted.
When the reality is... models are not science.

So I have to be clear. There is no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming.

If you wish to pretend models are science...which they are not...
then I have to explain even your models have failed.


2. By the way there are traders who question whether anyone can have your claimed win rates and low to almost no drawdown while trading from colombia and not using colocated servers and computers algos.

If you wish to have me question you... I can.
I know a lot of the questions to ask but probably not all of them.

Lets start with one set ..

What instruments are you giving us the P&L for?
What is your percentage of market orders vs limit orders?
How many cancels do you average per execution?
More...

giphy.gif
 
WeToddDid2 said:
Blahahahahahaha...conspiracy......blahahahah

You have been ranting for years about specifically what a court ruled as complete bullshit.

You have been peddling fake as news.

You are the one that has been pushing a conspiracy about a conspiracy.
More...


So is CO2 a greenhouse gas or not? If you do not know, you can Google it. We will await your considered response. lol
 
jem said:
I have to repeat the phrase accurately because your team always tries to play gotcha instead of providing science.


I could say there is no peer reviewed science which says that man made co2 causes warming.
As the founder of green peace says...

But then you will pull out garbage papers which claim that models can be trusted.
When the reality is... models are not science.

So I have to be clear. There is no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming.

If you wish to pretend models are science...which they are not...
then I have to explain even your models have failed.

----
2. Contrary to your argument the other day... there are traders who question whether anyone can have your claimed win rates and low to almost no drawdown while trading from colombia and not using colocated servers and computers algos.

If you wish to have me question you... I can. I traded for a living for about 7 years... I made 10 to 40 trades a day.
I know a lot of the questions to ask and I am sure if you could answer them I would believe you. I am not saying you should or you will.

But my point is that almost no professional trader would believe you could make that many trades a day with that win rate and that low a draw down.
More...

giphy.gif
 
WeToddDid2 said:
Blahahahahahaha...conspiracy......blahahahah

You have been ranting for years about specifically what a court ruled as complete bullshit.

You have been peddling fake as news.

You are the one that has been pushing a conspiracy about a conspiracy.
More...

It's all about conspiracy hahaha

See Trump yesterday with his one about rape and stuff, your PUTUS Pootie's POTUS had to say he was not peddling conspiracy theories before he speaks now.

That is a badge of confidence.

Fuck off you dopey lobbiest's whore. Xxx
 
Poindexter said:
Related reading:
The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare
3/29/2018
https://www.investors.com/politics/...stical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/
More...

So the 'scientist' is quoting an editorial by 'Investors' which is published in the 'politics' section.

And the editorial is based on Tony Heller's 'analysis' who has no qualifications and is a paid shill, a bad shill who didn't know the difference between sea ice and a glacier.

https://tonyhellerakastevengoddard.com/who-is-tony-heller/

Thanks for exposing the kind of scientist you are Con.
 
exGOPer said:
So the 'scientist' is quoting an editorial by 'Investors' which is published in the 'politics' section.

And the editorial is based on Tony Heller's 'analysis' who has no qualifications and is a paid shill, a bad shill who didn't know the difference between sea ice and a glacier.

https://tonyhellerakastevengoddard.com/who-is-tony-heller/

Thanks for exposing the kind of scientist you are Con.
More...

Did you catch him with his Canada trade stuff? He used Excel. Shining moment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top