Classic Geometric Patterns and Narrow Range Setups

Quote from Grob109:

for this we simply do a mechanical thing by drawing lines using one rule of geometry.

The key consideration is why does the geometry rule apply? And why does it work. So there is an answer involved as we all see. Lets say you cannot figure out nor understand what others explain to you about why it works. It works. You can't under stand why or how though. Does it matter?

It may matter. It is an issue related to being able to assimilate this as a tool for making money. You need to use it to make decisions and it is paramount that you "trust". You will incorporate it as a belief and then trust it always.

The geometry rule is that parallel lines can be drawn though points if you have three points. you use the rule to get the "left" trend line which is where price often maxes and where the trend always reverses a traverse from one side to the other. In trends the trend always bounces off trend lines. You construct the trend line asap from the minimum of points.

I have used this for nearly fifty years as the envelope of money making with trends. There are always trend lines at play. 100% of the time on a chart you have trend lines.

I use LT, IT, Daily, Intraday trend lines and within them I use traverses which are the finest detailed mini trends to get across slower periodicity trend line pairs.

I trust two parallel lines for trading. I always have several sets of parallel lines set up in ever slower periodicities that are "outside and beyond" the fractal I am using to make money.

A person posted that this is an illusion. It is not. and it is the most super way to learn how beliefs work to help you make money.

I trust trend lines and they tell me when and how to be alert for makng timely decisions like nothing else can.

i recommend drawing each and every trend line every day and having the experience of seeing price come to them and cause you to make a decision.

The last FOMC price movement zinged all over the place. On ES it happened to come to the lines of the daily trend that was in effect for two days before the event and the day of the event. I was mentoring a person who "trusts" trend lines. he got to have his first "Greenspan". We wrote out the three associated trades before 14:00 hours. We took the first trade the "smart money" gave us on YM04M as "flapper" indicated 14:09 or there abouts Trend lines forming channels were very helpful to us on these fast paced "tapes".


Hey Jack,

Another great post. Things seem to becoming more and more clear to me. Thank you. I've been studying your channel strategy for a bit now and it's been a great eye opener. Though I've only used intraday channels and have yet to incorporate longer term channels with it, which is the next step. While channels are great for setting entry points and exit targets, I still find I often miss the first move of a new channel, and this is because the channel hasn't been formed yet. For example, the ES has been trending downward, fails to traverse to the left line, and moves up breaking through the right channel line. The down channel is now void. The long thrust upward continues and then stalls, and begins to pull back. So we have point 1 at the failure to traverse, and a point 2 where the breakout move upward stalled. But we need a point 3 to establish a channel, which hasn't yet occured. So we don't have the luxury of a right line in place for our entry long. I notice that most channels, once established after point 3 was made, traverse perfectly to the left line. But many short lived channels only have this one move after point 3, before a new channel is formed, so missing the entry at point 3 is painful. I guess you need to use other indicators for this one particular channel-less entry? Is the YM/INDU enough at this point? It's a terrific tool, but I seem to get whipsawed when using it on it's own. Perhaps I just need more practice. For timing the first pullback of a new trend, I've played around with MA's, bollinger bands, and pitchforks, but neither of them is consistent enough for me to "trust" completely, and you never mentioned any of them, so I'm inclined to just toss them. If you have any thoughts and feel like commenting, I'd love to hear it. I feel like I'm stuck at this point.
 
Quote from nasdorq:

Hey Jack,

Another great post. Things seem to becoming more and more clear to me. Thank you. I've been studying your channel strategy for a bit now and it's been a great eye opener. Though I've only used intraday channels and have yet to incorporate longer term channels with it, which is the next step. While channels are great for setting entry points and exit targets, I still find I often miss the first move of a new channel, and this is because the channel hasn't been formed yet. For example, the ES has been trending downward, fails to traverse to the left line, and moves up breaking through the right channel line. The down channel is now void. The long thrust upward continues and then stalls, and begins to pull back. So we have point 1 at the failure to traverse, and a point 2 where the breakout move upward stalled. But we need a point 3 to establish a channel, which hasn't yet occured. So we don't have the luxury of a right line in place for our entry long. I notice that most channels, once established after point 3 was made, traverse perfectly to the left line. But many short lived channels only have this one move after point 3, before a new channel is formed, so missing the entry at point 3 is painful. I guess you need to use other indicators for this one particular channel-less entry? Is the YM/INDU enough at this point? It's a terrific tool, but I seem to get whipsawed when using it on it's own. Perhaps I just need more practice. For timing the first pullback of a new trend, I've played around with MA's, bollinger bands, and pitchforks, but neither of them is consistent enough for me to "trust" completely, and you never mentioned any of them, so I'm inclined to just toss them. If you have any thoughts and feel like commenting, I'd love to hear it. I feel like I'm stuck at this point.


You won't be stuck for long.

What you wrote above is flawless and can only be the result of getting the job done on the chart.

The efficiency that you now have is to be able to profit from the 3rd traverse of the 4 or more major channels that form during a day.

Here are some things to that will enhance your situation. I will try to get you to a point 1 and you can take it from there over and over.

Lets do the first, second and fourth channels of a daily supply that looks like an M or a W. The pace on the first channel is usually fast trend channel so it may be a "tape"

I had a call today that went like this: "I got up (in AZ it is an early start) and looked things over". "I noted (he uses short horizontal lines) the overnite H/L" "It was my first guess on today's possible H/L"

Okay he is set for the tape: The first leg of the M or W. (If you read the Greenspan post I made note how identical it is)

He can estimate the exit from his pre open work. First we get the open, though. What I mean is this. The tape usually goes from open to either the H or L of the day and at least the AM H or L.

We can bank this as a multi point sucess that ends in one of two things. Either another trend in the opposite direction or some slaloming on the R or S. If the overnite H/L is on either the R or S, respectiviely, or they are in "compression", that is not making the R or S and just being "inside" R/S.

As in the FOMC Greenspan trades, the "Tape long ran up to the H of the overnite H/L. As you see it going there and getting there you have the first point 1 of the day and it is for the second channel of the day.

For all point 1's, you have the "right" to believe in them. It is fortunate that the volume at open sets a fast pace trend and this leads directly to failure at the end of the trend.

Today trend 2 started out with a narrow channel like a tape also. We were runnning over 10 to 12 k. More important, we were nailing down over 20K where the DOM fifth cummulative level was relatively low (under 4 to 5K). This means there are a lot of three digit "protection" and fake contracts sitting on both sides of the DOM.

You got to draw a lot of lines for traverses on trend 2. bar 3 and 4 tops gape you the tape downright line. point 2 was bottom of bar 4. The left to right traverse was "down" and just a hold after the entry by reversal at the end of the tape on the overnite H value of around 17.0.

You see volume declining on the left to right traverse. (As expected). Thus you are "holding" through bar 5, and 6. (end of taping). Thus you are looking for "new point 3" as you hold through bar 7 to bar 8. top of 8 is new point 3. 9 and 10 cause the right to left traverse on high volume in direction of "hold" (short). You are now back to the open as..............POINT 1 forms for the next trend.

Here we are in a F
AILURE TO TRAVERSE=POINT 1 OF NEXT TREND

On bar 10 you watched all through the bar and "knew" the PRV was lower than that of bar 9.

You are solidly in the day by now. Two trades of 5 and 10 points respectively. The second "hold" was for 7 or 8 bars. youhad to draw two sets of channel lines for the second trade.

You SEE that the volume bars are the color of the trends you traded.

Okay. Use yellow high liner to pick off all the points I have made so far to reinforce your post.

You go long on bar 10 as it spikes. Bar 11 rolls. It is high volume over (higher than) bar 10.

Now the rest of the am goes into meduim pace.(bar 12) Use volume to get the pace.

You have bottoms of bar 10 and 11 defining the long right line and the top of br 11 defining the left channel line.

Slow down and think. All the channels and volume stuff tell you just where you are at all times.

Right now you are in the third channel on a first right to left traverse (defined by the "tape" of bars 10 and 11) that has taken two bars. The pace of the channel is determined on bar 12. So you "see" bar 12 is an inside bar after bar 11 "spiked".

You are 3 points plus into the third trade and you hae given up profits if you did not exit on the spike of bar 11 and "watch". Say you have everything straight up to here.

Where you are now is way ahead of your post and still in a trade (long) that is shifting to a "medium" pace. Try to get to medium pace thinking. review my descriptions of medium paced stuff. You read that on the first reverse that you can hold through it because there is little reversal possibility.

Okay sit and hold. And draw the medium paced channel after you get point 3.

Okay unwritten but implied, I have taken you to and past another point 1 on the way to point 3. This all helps to get you unstuck.

What is getting you stuck is being on sidelines and getting into the market. I avoided that by getting you into the market at the beginning of the day after synch. Today we had "jobs" before open kick starting the day. Naturally, Rumsfeld tempered everything for 6 hours.

Lets say you trade the bar 10 etc. Bar 15 gave you the point 3 for the medium paced channel and you "held" to the "failure to traverse" at around 13 plus. This is a point 1 which takes you into a"short", that ends with a slow paced volume for midday (bar 21).

Sideline for the low midday volume after the four trades of the AM. (5, 10, 6, 3)

You get to centering on bars 49, and 50 on VDU volume. It is after 13:30 and Rumsfeld is still doing his thing.

Good employment news, lousy everything else news.

On bar 51 you begin five more trades for the afternoon. a tape short followed by four more color reversals on volume all kewl for each trades point 1's 2's and 3's.

It is your call to trade each HVS bars of the middle short trend of the PM. The five trades look like 9, 3, 4, 2, and 6 points each.

It's somewhere around 50 points for the day.

You are at the place in life that when you have point 1 (it is the end of the prior trend), that you can enter on the point 1 of a trend. Reversals work just fine for this.

Trade fast pace (4 today) as 10 to 12K or more volume. 20k stuff is easier.

Trade medium pace as 4,500 to 10K volume these trends (4 today) can be slalomed after the new point 3.

Sideline exit for midday. trading on "noise" is silly when you are knocking down nearly 50 points a day.

Use of more indicators. the fast STOC 50% line is your second signal for being on the "right" side of a trend. As it goes through 50% to the side of the trend (to 20 for short, to 80 for long) you confirm that you are making money. Use the slpe of the MACD as another indicator. If you have those down well from the past, use what you learned there instead for better info.

The pace, the channel lines and spiking will really nail all trades for you.

MA's guarrantee that you will miss half of profits, Bollinger bands always have one faulty side and are lagging. I do not know what a pichpork is.
 
Grob, I'm sure you are 100% correct in all your assertions but I do have a question.

On the planet you came from, did they have a stock market?



:p
 
Grob109 -

I find that when you give this type of bar-by-bar running commentary it
is extremely helpful for cementing certain concepts. It's the next best thing
to looking over your shoulder.

Keep 'em coming.

JT
 
Some of the authors who use the NR/ID setup to identify consolidation and break opportunities look for a multi-day trade. The indices have certainly cooperated by printing the "classic" result from an NR/ID break. It might be a good idea to print the charts and keep the hard copies for future reference.

"A picture is worth a thousand words" and all that.

:)
 
Quote from Grob109:

You won't be stuck for long.


Very interesting Jack. I had never thought of a tape trend being it's own channel. I've usually held back on those because if I didn't catch it at the beginning of the move I feel like I'm chasing.

Another thing I got from your reply was that you seem to hold a lot more, than jumping in and out. I assumed you would enter on point 1, reverse on point 2, reverse again on point 3, etc. But it seems like you might hold on the pullback, looking for a point 3, which then gives you the channel and a nice place to exit on the left line. If this is the case, then my previous question as to timing the point 3 as an entry might might not be necessary, since you are already holding from point 1. Maybe I'm incorrect in this assumption. After I posted I later realized that I have the same trouble timing the point 1 entry as a point 3 entry, that being neither of them are off channels, but are used to establish the channel after the points have been made. I find I get a little whipsawed using the YM/INDU on it's own. For example, the ES is falling and is in mid-channel, I see a spike on the YM/INDU and enter long thinking it might be a failure to traverse, only to see it collapse through it and continue further down, often to the left line. I usually get in on the "spike", so when it comes back down to the low it's usually exit with a 3 tick loss. To me, catching a bottom like this in mid channel is very difficult (or similarly a top). Sometimes chart patterns can help such as double bottoms, but when there's no support, timing the failure to traverse seems very tricky. I guess it comes with more practice. You said channels, spikes and pace will nail all trades. I've only been using the first 2, so hopefully learning to recognize the pace will help.
 
Back in late 1999, I coded the NR7 bars by Alan Farley into TS, but I was not skilled in price projection at the time and I had a small account, so I left it alone.

Later I also coded Jack's ranking system into RadarScreen. That works pretty well. But I became fascinated by the leverage that futures bring.

As far as I know, no one has been able to code geometric pattern. Hell, it's even hard to code candlestick patterns because geometey and dojis, haramis, etc are such visual patterns, and therefore too subjective for TradeStation, anyway.

I do hope that you keep this up. You bring ideas to the table without all the ego, and that is very refreshing.

Regards
Oddi
Oddi - thanks for the very kind thoughts. On ET we're all in this together after all, so we should be hoping for one another's success.

The book Professional Stock Trading, by Conway and Behle, has some TS programs for coding geometric patterns. I studied the language for a bit to see if I could identify crossover terms to something like Excel or StockWatch Pro, but I didn't really find any. Since I don't use TS and I end up looking at a fairly finite basket of stocks all day anyway, I didn't do any further work with it.

One of the neat things about StockWatch Pro is that it scans real time intraday data. So if you want to continually scan for real time NRID setups using 15 minute bars or 5 minute etc., you can.

Hopefully easyguru will see this thread again. He contributed some very, very nice candidates earlier.
 
Quote from easyguru:

Still around. :)
Alright!!!

Sunny' I'm glad you're here too. Perhaps your perspective will shed a different light on what I believe are worthwhile setups. Also, would you mind posting what you are looking for in the way of profit opportunity? I don't mean number of shares or dollars per trade.... more like you want to hold'em for no more than 15 minutes, or several days... something like that. Or maybe you could provide an amount you are willing to lose, say a quarter point, a half point, maybe a percentage.

This could be an interesting exercise in that we apparently are in a trading range during the summer doldrums. This would seem to connote non-trending less-volatile price action and therefore a tough environment for trading. Worst case scenario is we will determine that geometric pattern breaks and narrow range breaks are not very successful during non-trending less-volatile periods.

Even more interesting would be some sort of communal effort intraday that tries to determine exit parameters. Ultimately it would be nice to form a room in the chat that is dedicated to these setups where participants actually make money throughout the day trading some of these setups. That wouldn't suck.
 
Back
Top