it raises an interesting question though. obviously when you short you take the risk that natural free market forces move the market against you.
what about when it's a deliberate action by a quasi governmental body to save failing institutions who used too much leverage? isn't that the ultimate form of manipulation to favor a small specific group of participants who made poor trading decisions?
what is 'too big to fail' supposed to mean in a supposedly free market? if the market isn't allowed to pursue natural corrections, isn't that the same as rewarding participants for 'bad' decisions?
we might all trade 60 to 1 leverage if we knew we'd get bailed out of trouble