Hi MFB, nice trading today -- I had to leave early (as I do every Tuesday, around noon to 1pm) , and missed the nice move up near the close.
I did a little searching on ACD, and found this quotation:
So with how you use the method, is it very mechanical? The trades you take seem to be quite based on market action, and are some of the same trades I either take, or in today's case, should have taken when I saw them. It seems like with the rules I read in that article (which I'm sure are only a small sample of the whole thing), that it would be easy to back test mechanically to get a picture of max drawdown. The fact that Fisher says it does not work very well with the S&P concerns me--not because I care about the S&P, but because at times all markets can change and evolve, and my biggest fear is to be successful with a trading system that's very rule-based for a year or two, and then have my world turned upside down because it stops working. Hence, I'm quite discretionary, and while I'm having good success now, I'm always on the lookout for methods which can help me.
I did a little searching on ACD, and found this quotation:
Keep in mind that, although we used the S&P 500 Index in the above example, Fisher did say in a telephone interview that it does not work particularly well and that he believes there are far better candidates to trade with the ACD. It is also important to note that it does not work very well on low volatility equities stuck in a trading range.
Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/technical/04/032404.asp#ixzz1XDBD2lgH
So with how you use the method, is it very mechanical? The trades you take seem to be quite based on market action, and are some of the same trades I either take, or in today's case, should have taken when I saw them. It seems like with the rules I read in that article (which I'm sure are only a small sample of the whole thing), that it would be easy to back test mechanically to get a picture of max drawdown. The fact that Fisher says it does not work very well with the S&P concerns me--not because I care about the S&P, but because at times all markets can change and evolve, and my biggest fear is to be successful with a trading system that's very rule-based for a year or two, and then have my world turned upside down because it stops working. Hence, I'm quite discretionary, and while I'm having good success now, I'm always on the lookout for methods which can help me.