Quote from gov:
1) Should you not be in long here??
2) Edit: I feel like I should give you 1/2 of the last trade. Your timely news made me feel all warm and fuzzy in that trade! In Al Brooks terms, that initial trade was an L2, double reversed(requires 3x initial trade) at .88/.89 (a failed L2, a very high probabilty trade in Brooks estimation) and one I particularly treasure. I am a bit sad he published these things...lol!
1) Yes, I should have gone long in the 11:50-55 bar at .60-ish (add at .70, wait for a pullback, add at .80-ish) and targeted a test of the previous LOD, but you can see I was writing things like "up, up"; "go baby, go"; "fuck"; I'm jinxed"; etc., all markers of loss of focus and a tell of being in risk of going on tilt, more so after closing that short at the very tick it tanked and then thinking of shorting the first retest to the upside of the LOD, so I walked away.
2) Hmmm... ok, my account number is... hahaha, you're too kind, Gov, I'm glad you did well. I like how you reverse without going crazy.
---
Nice trading, Blox, way to go.
)