Apart from having a predefined entry method based on accommodating price action, and a corresponding protective exit level to control risk, I would argue that anticipation is closer to gambling than is reacting. I think anticipation harbors more risk than reaction.Quote from schizo:
Sorry, but you're completely wrong. Trading isn't about gambling and clairvoyance. But it is about probability. In another word, ANTICIPATION plays a very large role. If you truly want to succeed as a trader, you must master this concept, period. Every good trader MUST KNOW IN ADVANCE where he will enter, where he will take profit and where he will place his stop. Otherwise, it really is a gambling...
As for probability, as it relates to the market's future price action, I think that people who hang their hat on numeric specificity are an accident waiting to happen. There is no probability distribution of future price. There is only uncertainty. An ever changing frequency distribution of past price behavior over time does not actually translate into a reliable probability distribution with numeric specificity of future price behavior. One can certainly use the term "balance of probability" because it is a much more crude assessment. And it is sufficient for trading purposes. But anyone attempting to use actual but non-existent probability with numeric specificity regarding future price action is dreaming.