CL Redux

Quote from NoDoji:



If I ever allow a trade taken by my actual self or my automated self to give back .90 of a 1.00+ unrealized profit, :D [/B]

I've done this many times on position trades :mad:

I agree though on day trades, an intervention should be performed!
 
Quote from InvestVision:

Here we are with paper SIM account

1/ the account took big hit right after the start

comments welcome ...

I prefer to treat a swing trade using the daily chart much as I would an intraday swing using the 5-min chart. You went long on 3/10, but I'm not sure what time you took the position. In the 3/10 overnight session, price broke the key near-term support level of 103.33, then continued to break down pretty hard. I wouldn't consider swinging a long until either a previous day's high was taken out (confirmed entry) or price pulled back to the 20-day EMA (anticipatory entry). Price in fact found immediate support at the 20-day EMA (99.00 zone) on 3/11 during the overnight sell off. So a limit order in that area would've taken you into a swing long, that you could still be holding if you didn't move the stop to b/e at any point.

I think the place where you entered long was based on news momentum. In that case, I'd be using a very tight stop in case the momentum fizzled.
 
Quote from Visaria:

I've done this many times on position trades :mad:

Yeah, me too with stocks and options swing trades. I just stick with day trading now. Instant gratification on the profit side and minor pain on the loss side :cool:
 
Quote from InvestVision:

Here we are with paper SIM account

1/ the account took big hit right after the start

2/ I thought of closing positions today around 100.30 levels for loss , then came this news event 'Bahrain' which is providing support.

3/ I know this will attract criticism of you ignored while it is low , now coming back when price is rising . As I said above I am ready to take $3 loss if it was not for Baharin news event. (had many opportunities since trade started to get out with $3 loss). Again you have to see this is POSITION trade with max 5. trades/week allowed NOT Intraday trade.

3.2/ $3 draw down is close to 22% draw down for this account which is not acceptable in many cases .


4/ this trade so far took huge drawdown , I would say $3/contract draw-down is reasonable to assume. I won't consider those steep lows as there were lots of opportunities to get out with $3 loss and this is POSITION trade not Intraday.

5/ moving forward I will update comments once in 2 days even if no trades , to give my perspective and to avoid confusion.

6/ treat this as academic study where we all can learn some thing, this is NOT praise/criticism of anybody trading style.

7/ Now adding a 'limit sell' at 102.89

comments welcome ...
Some thoughts.

I like the idea of not overtrading. And as riskaddict pointed out the other day, sometimes when we just let things go and don't mess with them we get the best results.

Quote from riskaddict:

I was wrong but I was right. Covering one week to the day at 100.25 not paying attention to anything seems to really help me.

And I'm sure we've all observed this. I know when I've done SIM trades and even when it moved slightly against me or showed a smaller profit and I let it go to see what it would do, more often times then not it yields much larger profits. Now on the other hand I've let some of those go without a stop and was just hammered. :) So we do need some control.

I know you've limited this to only 5 trades a week and that's okay as we don't want this experiment to just turn into another day trading example as we already are doing that anyway. The main way I would change this, and this ties into everything I've been saying on this thread all along, is I'd make sure I'm on the right side of the trade to begin with and even then as NoDoji has said below, I'd use a fairly tight stop to assure this.

Quote from NoDoji:

I think the place where you entered long was based on news momentum. In that case, I'd be using a very tight stop in case the momentum fizzled.

This may take a few tries to get the best entry, but that's okay. So the 5 trade limitation may have to be expanded. But once you are on the right side, then you can hold it longer. I talked about all of this before and I myself really do want to work at finding ways to hold positions longer once I'm on the right side of the trade. Anyone observing my trading results, although I don't post all of my trades here, would see that sometimes I've been too impatient to take a smaller profit on maybe a shallow reversal. But on the other hand, in support of that is the fact that there are more major reversals and as we've mentioned in the last few pages, we don't want to let a 100 tick profit turn into a 10 tick profit. And quite often it's not easy to figure out which is which.

I had several previous posts in which I mentioned that letting winners run more is the way to bigger profits. And from some of the posts I've read evidently schizo helped NoDoji with this. Is that correct? Now this is providing we can discern an underlying trend and I agree with NoDoji that daily charts are more useful to find these.

It's not that easy to swing trade CL right now as it has found some congestion around this level after the initial move out of the 80's and 90's. And there are so many cross currents as your posts point out.

I like your experiment. Let's see what we can all learn.

ADD Just wanted to add this post from NoDoji from Matcha's journal which is relevant to some of my comments above maybe.

Quote from NoDoji:

When you say you exited too soon, do you mean you exited before your profit target (or target zone) was hit, or that you exited based on your trading plan and then price moved further in your favor without you? There's a difference. If you hold for target and price then keeps going without you, then in retrospect it's always "too soon", but in terms of trading your plan, your exit would be fine. :)
 
Just wanted to share this quote from darkhorse from the "Books that have significantly influenced your trading perspective" thread. This is the thread, not the quote, which isn't on the thread itself.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=212857

It's from this link, and I'm not promoting the book as I haven't read it or even looked into it yet. But I have mentioned darkhorse and his website. But I like the quote which made me chuckle. :)

Here's the link.
http://www.mercenarytrader.com/2011/01/weekender-diary-of-a-professional-commodity-trader-review/

Here's the quote. So true. :)

"There is an old saying among professional racetrack handicappers: The losing player is the one who tells you he breaks even; the breakeven player is the one who tells you he is a consistent winner; and the winning player is the one who tells you it’s a tough, tough game, with great dedication required for success."
 
I couldn't agree more :D

"There is an old saying among professional racetrack handicappers:
- The losing player is the one who tells you he breaks even;
- the breakeven player is the one who tells you he is a consistent winner;
- and the winning player is the one who tells you it’s a tough, tough game, with great dedication required for success."
 
Damn, we're already down nearly $2 from the high. This clearly explains why you shouldn't swing trade in this environment. There are simply too many unknowns.
 
Schizo...JMO it could be fear of economic meltdown which would collapse the demand for energy. If Japan falls into the economic abyss....perhaps it will take us with it. Remember our recovery is very fragile and it is a world economy. Nuclear disaster anywhere in the world affects the entire world. If disaster is averted then a positive rebuilding energy happens and we re-focus on the mid-East and energy goes up.

The best place right now is probably the sidelines....both energy and ES. I'm holding a couple of long ES contracts and will do so thru the nite at least as some of this could just be media (options exp) hype. If we are down 50 ES in the AM I'll start building a fall out shelter!

Go back and look at 08 when we went from 140-35 in 7 months...because of the recession
 
Back
Top