Church Issues Crypto Token Backed by God

All of that info comes from the bible. And there are a lot of people that find it hard to follow, even me, because a lot of us want to do whatever we want. Just like I'm getting the assumption that you like to have multiple sex partners. But think about all the problems that come from living that lifestyle. Wouldn't you say there's probably a good reason why it's a law? And one thing is for sure though, there is no false information in the bible. Every thing said in it is accurate. There is even evidence and artifacts found that confirm information in the bible says.

Everyone on this planet either believes 1 of 2 things. We were either created from God. Or we evolutionized into what we are today. Some don't want to believe in God because if they believe in evolution then they can live their lives the way they want. Some chose to believe in God, but they find a religion that fits their lifestyle, "All you have to do is believe and you'll be saved in heaven!"

My advice to you is to do your own research and think for yourself. Because there is more out there than just being born and dying.
That's all nice, now how do you leap from the idea that something had to trigger to big bang to all of that bullshit again? I think even most rednecks can grasp that the idea that agreeing to the idea that something created the universe in no way supports your specific theology or any of the thousands of others out there, can you?

BTW, I've been monogamous to my wife for the 25 years since we married. Not because some imaginary being said I had to, turns out I'm actually capable of developing my own morals without someone having to dictate them to me. But I could give fuck-all if some woman wants to have sex with multiple men or women for that matter. And I sure as heck don't think that believing some entity created the universe has any relevance to that in the slightest. BTW, back to wwjd, take a look at Matthew 7:1-5. Judge much?
 
That's all nice, now how do you leap from the idea that something had to trigger to big bang to all of that bullshit again? I think even most rednecks can grasp that the idea that agreeing to the idea that something created the universe in no way supports your specific theology or any of the thousands of others out there, can you?

Like I said, it's in the bible. And if you have ever tried to read it, which it sound like you have since you can quote Matthew, it talks about how the Earth was made and how the Earth is floating in space. This information dates back thousands of years ago before they even knew how the Earth was being supported. The bible was written thousands of years ago, so that in itself should give you evidence to realize the Bible was written from God. There are also other scientific and artifacts that where found that support the bible as well.

BTW, I've been monogamous to my wife for the 25 years since we married. Not because some imaginary being said I had to, turns out I'm actually capable of developing my own morals without someone having to dictate them to me. But I could give fuck-all if some woman wants to have sex with multiple men or women for that matter.

Well it's good you have morals. But don't you think that if you gave someone a place to live that they should abide by your rules of the house? Or do you think they should be free to do whatever they want in your house?

BTW, back to wwjd, take a look at Matthew 7:1-5. Judge much?

Yes that is a good scripture. But did I ever say anything to give you the assumption that I am judging? You're free to live your own life. I'm just here to encourage you to search for answers if you really want them. And if you don't want to search for answers or live a life I don't agree with, then hey, it was good talking to you, have a great day.
 
it talks about how the Earth was made and how the Earth is floating in space. This information dates back thousands of years ago before they even knew how the Earth was being supported. The bible was written thousands of years ago, so that in itself should give you evidence to realize the Bible was written from God. There are also other scientific and artifacts that where found that support the bible as well.
I think jumping to these conclusions is a tad simplistic.
Imo, the bible is a social political document contrived by the Jews, who no doubt are intelligent and cunning.

Bible written by God? Absolute nonsense imo! That's just religous spiel to justify all the bullshit it contains and the half truths.

The world as we know it revolves around Jewish mythology, the Western world is hooked on the 'Jewish drug' of bullshit. Well and truly hooked!

Give the Jews credit, I don't know any other race which has been so effective with brainwashing so many earthlings with their "Jews are the master race blessed by god".

South America had a very advanced civilisation, but you don't hear about that because it's drowned out by brainwashed bible cultists clamour.
 
I think jumping to these conclusions is a tad simplistic.
Imo, the bible is a social political document contrived by the Jews, who no doubt are intelligent and cunning.

Bible written by God? Absolute nonsense imo! That's just religous spiel to justify all the bullshit it contains and the half truths.

The world as we know it revolves around Jewish mythology, the Western world is hooked on the 'Jewish drug' of bullshit. Well and truly hooked!

Give the Jews credit, I don't know any other race which has been so effective with brainwashing so many earthlings with their "Jews are the master race blessed by god".

South America had a very advanced civilisation, but you don't hear about that because it's drowned out by brainwashed bible cultists clamour.

Well sounds like you've already made up your mind about the bible even though I have given you a scientific example. Have you ever tried reading the bible? No where does it ever say anything about the Jews being a superior race or else that would be racist. Now it does talk a lot about the Jewish civilization because Jesus was a Jew. Just like if he was Chinese, then there would be a lot of Chinese talk. Make sense?

Never heard of the South American civilization. Care to elaborate?
 
Well sounds like you've already made up your mind about the bible even though I have given you a scientific example.
Just like you've made up your mind.
Have you ever tried reading the bible?
Mate, read it numerous times, you do that when brainwashed like I once was.
Never heard of the South American civilization. Care to elaborate?
Yup, will post link shortly.
 
And one thing is for sure though, there is no false information in the bible. Every thing said in it is accurate.
When the Bible has a contradiction, at least one of the statements must be false.
https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/reasons-humanists-reject-bible/
Contradictions
The Bible is an unreliable authority because it contains numerous contradictions. Logically, if two statements are contradictory, at least one of them is false. The biblical contradictions therefore prove that the book has many false statements and is not infallible.

Examples of Old Testament Contradictions
The contradictions start in the opening chapters of the Bible, where inconsistent creation stories are told. Genesis chapter 1 says the first man and woman were made at the same time, and after the animals. But Genesis chapter 2 gives a different order of creation: man, then the animals, and then woman.

Genesis chapter 1 lists six days of creation, whereas chapter 2 refers to the “day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.” Genesis 1:2-3 claims that God created light and divided it from darkness on the first day; but Genesis 1:14-19 tells us the sun, moon, and stars weren’t made until the fourth day.

Chapter 1 reports that the fruit trees were created before the man, while chapter 2 indicates they were made after him. Genesis 1:20 says the fowl were created out of the waters; Genesis 2:19 alleges they were formed from the ground.

Contradictions are also seen in the biblical story of a worldwide flood. According to Genesis 6:19-22, God ordered Noah to bring “of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort . . . into the ark.” Nevertheless, Genesis 7:2-3 relates that the Lord ordered Noah to take into the ark the clean beasts and the birds by sevens, and only the unclean beasts by twos.

Genesis 8:4 reports that, as the waters of the flood receded, Noah’s ark rested on the mountains of Ararat in the seventh month. The very next verse, however, says the mountaintops could not be seen until the tenth month.

Genesis 8:13 describes the earth as being dry on the first day of the first month. But Genesis 8:14 informs us the earth was not dry until the twenty-seventh day of the second month.

The Old Testament contains an interesting contradiction in the story of the census taken by King David and the resulting punishment of the Israelites. God was so angered by the census that he sent a plague that killed 70,000 men. According to II Samuel 24:1, the Lord had caused David to take the census – which makes the punishment appear even more nonsensical. But an attempt was later made, at I Chronicles 21:1, to improve God’s image by claiming that Satan incited the census.

Further, the Old Testament is contradictory as to whether the Lord commanded the Israelites to sacrifice animals to him. At Jeremiah 7:22, God denies he ever gave the Israelites commandments about animal sacrifices. In contrast, Exodus 29:38-42 and many other verses depict God as requiring the Israelites to offer animal sacrifices.

Examples of New Testament Contradictions
In the New Testament, there are contradictions between the genealogies of Jesus given in the first chapter of Matthew and the third chapter of Luke.

Both genealogies begin with Jesus’ father, who is identified as Joseph (which is curious, given that Mary was supposedly impregnated by the Holy Ghost). But Matthew says Joseph’s father was Jacob, while Luke claims he was Heli. Matthew lists 26 generations between Jesus and King David, whereas Luke records 41. Matthew runs Jesus’ line of descent through David’s son Solomon, while Luke has it going through David’s son Nathan.

The story of Jesus’ birth is also contradictory. Matthew 2:13-15 depicts Joseph and Mary as fleeing to Egypt with the baby Jesus immediately after the wise men from the east had brought gifts.

But Luke 2:22-40 claims that after the birth of Jesus, his parents remained in Bethlehem for the time of Mary’s purification (which was 40 days, under the Mosaic law). Afterwards, they brought Jesus to Jerusalem “to present him to the Lord,” and then returned to their home in Nazareth. Luke mentions no journey into Egypt or visit by wise men from the east.

Concerning the death of Judas, the disloyal disciple, Matthew 27:5 states he took the money he had received for betraying Jesus, threw it down in the temple, and “went and hanged himself.” To the contrary, Acts 1:18 claims Judas used the money to purchase a field and “falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.”

In describing Jesus being led to his execution, John 19:17 recounts that he carried his own cross. But Mark 15:21-23 disagrees by saying a man called Simon carried the cross.

As for the crucifixion, Matthew 27:44 tells us Jesus was taunted by both criminals who were being crucified with him. But Luke 23:39-43 relates that only one of the criminals taunted Jesus, the other criminal rebuked the one who was doing the taunting, and Jesus told the criminal who was defending him, “Today shalt thou be with me in paradise.”

Regarding the last words of Jesus while on the cross, Matthew 27:46 and Mark 15:34 quote Jesus as crying with a loud voice, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Luke 23:46 gives his final words as, “Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit.” John 19:30 alleges the last words were, “It is finished.”

There are even contradictions in the accounts of the resurrection – the supposed event that is the very foundation of the Christian religion. Mark 16:2 states that on the day of the resurrection, certain women arrived at the tomb at the rising of the sun. But John 20:1 informs us they arrived when it was yet dark. Luke 24:2 describes the tomb as open when the women arrived, whereas Matthew 28:1-2 indicates it was closed. Mark 16:5 declares that the women saw a young man at the tomb, Luke 24:4 says they saw two men, Matthew 28:2 reports they saw an angel, and John 20:11-12 claims they saw two angels.

Also in the resurrection stories, there are contradictions as to the identity of the women who came to the tomb,[7] whether the men or angels the women saw were inside or outside the tomb,[8] whether the men or angels were standing or sitting,[9] and whether Mary Magdalene recognized the risen Jesus when he first appeared to her.[10]

As a final example of a New Testament contradiction, the conflicting accounts of Paul’s conversion can be cited. Acts 9:7 states that when Jesus called Paul to preach the gospel, the men who were with Paul heard a voice but saw no man. According to Acts 22:9, however, the men saw a light but didn’t hear the voice speaking to Paul.

The foregoing examples are just a few of the hundreds of contradictions contained in the Old and New Testaments. Each contradiction is an instance where at least one of the verses is wrong. Thus, hundreds of contradictions mean there are at least hundreds of incorrect statements in the Bible.
 
When the Bible has a contradiction, at least one of the statements must be false.
https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/reasons-humanists-reject-bible/

Interesting, I can't sit here and decypher them all. But One that didn't make sense to me is when you said Genesis 8:13 describes the earth as being dry on the first day of the first month. But Genesis 8:14 informs us the earth was not dry until the twenty-seventh day of the second month.

If you read it in the Bible it says in Genesis 8:13 that "Noah saw that the ground was drying" Meaning that it was probably very muddy. Now if you keep reading in Genesis 8:14 It says "The earth had dried off"

This makes perfect sense to me. And why would the writer make the stupid mistake of contradicting on just 1 verse later? The Earth was drying, meaning it wasn't completely dry yet, there was probably sloshy mud everywhere and big puddles and lakes everywhere. Makes sense that later on it would say the Earth was "Dried off".
 
Back
Top