In a short time after starting this journal, Breakout and other more seasoned traders, brought to my attention that my risk/reward ratio needed attention. Funny, I always realized this was an issue, but never took the time to fully evaluate the alternatives. (Guess I am already getting benefit for all this posting time)
My current plan was based around the ability to catch small 2 point (8 tick) moves, my risk was also set at 2 points( 8 ticks). Using this strategy, I had to have good success numbers. Obviously greater than 50/50 . I realized this, and my backtesting of the strategy proved acceptable and I showed good profit. I think the reality is that I am not superman and over time this is going to be a problem. I have actually been trading this realtime and have had success as I mentioned.
Late last week, I began backtesting a different risk/reward strategy. I looked at 2 points risk with a 6 point reward. You all have convinced me that this makes more sense and I appreciate the awakening.
What I did was a simple change. I switched to the 3 minute chart instead of the 1 minute chart. Nothing else is different at this point. I started the backtesting going back to 2001. It was a very enlightening experience. Although my success rate dropped, I was more profitable on fewer trades. Also, my set ups had the ability to produce a 6 point profit instead of just 2 points. It was really interesting because everything was pretty much the same, except I had a better risk/reward and could stand to lose a little more. The characteristics of price movement were pretty much identical at 3 minutes and 1 minute.
Some key results to date are:
% Trades Profitable 51%
Avg Trades per week 8
Avg Ticks per week 66
This is all based on trading 1 contract.
Based on this, I am going to begin using the new 3:1 reward/risk ratio of 6 points/2 points. I am not going to trade this live for real money yet. I will continue to develop this here in the journal and post the trades real time in my journal.
One thing that I liked is that there are fewer trades. My original system averaged 17 trades per week. It should be noted that I don't take every set up.
BACKTESTING
I don't know if this is how others do it, but I am only able to back test this strategy by using my TradeStation historical data and scrolling to the "right edge" to simulate real time. Since this is subjective, it can't be done using an automated backtest in easy language as far a I can tell. If there is a better way, I am all ears. I usually like to discount the backtested results because it is definitely easier to do this way than when the real time chart is ticking.
Also, I want to point out that many times using this new set up I could have easily moved my stop to breakeven. I did not. The result were either success (6 pts) or failure (-2 pts).
Also, I have only been able to back test about 4 months of data so far, I will continue and I will update the numbers. I realize I need more data tested. Things were just so similar, I have decided to begin formally testing it. Let's see how it works out here in the journal.