Quote from mhashe:
Keep it simple. Use the ADX with DMI
http://www2.barchart.com/support/learning.asp?code=BSTK&what=adxdir
I tend to agree insofar as exploitable trend identification is concerned. Sometimes, however, I get a transient feeling that I'm just being lazy and that I should hunker down and try to figure out the math of trend identification in a way that it can be reliably exploited rather than only identified after the fact. When that happens, I usually just take a few deep, healthful, cleansing, life-affirming breaths of fresh air and the feeling miraculously goes away. It's really quite refreshing.Quote from John Merchant:
Anything numerical is numerological. Or is that numerillogical? Mike.

(i) What makes you believe that there is a "math of trend identification"?Quote from Thunderdog:
I tend to agree insofar as exploitable trend identification is concerned. Sometimes, however, I get a transient feeling that I'm just being lazy and that I should hunker down and try to figure out the math of trend identification in a way that it can be reliably exploited rather than only identified after the fact. When that happens, I usually just take a few deep, healthful, cleansing, life-affirming breaths of fresh air and the feeling miraculously goes away. It's really quite refreshing.
![]()

Quote from ssrrkk:
how about this. use your favorite spectral analysis tool to find the dominant wavelengths of your timeseries. ifyou do find long wavelength components that have much larger coefficients compared to your high-frequency components (i.e., you must screen for stocks with this property), then you might be able to choose the appropriate window for your moving average indicator... pretty basic idea that should be easy to back test.
Quote from LMeyers:
Yes, I think so too. I think that the indices are getting ready to start trending bigtime - to the upside.