The message receiver doesn't actually "observe" the message... it just "is" the message. Real proof of faster than light communication... amazing. I had no idea this stuff was moving so quickly.Quote from Eight:
the message receiver has to observe the message too, would that not change it? And the universe is self-observing, so maybe the universe would have a say in things as well.. it could all turn into a big "he said-she said-the universe said" thingy..
Quote from heech:
The message receiver doesn't actually "observe" the message... it just "is" the message. Real proof of faster than light communication... amazing. I had no idea this stuff was moving so quickly.
Quote from RealityAnalyst:
Of course China is the future. Even Russia later on.
Because their currency is not printed with interest attached payable to Private Central Bank owned by old European families.
I believe the energy required would scale equivalently to the energy required for any other sort of laser-based communication. One of the resulting "entangled" photon needs to travel to the detector, and the detector needs to be able to see it. So... don't see why it wouldn't be viable.Quote from shortie:
how does the energy requirement for this sort of communication scales with distance? is it feasible to eventually instantaneously communicate with Mars?
i wonder if skype is overcharging me for international calls![]()